首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >Legitimation of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency in Solving Consumer Disputes Based on Act Number 8 Year 1999 about Consumer Protection
【24h】

Legitimation of Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency in Solving Consumer Disputes Based on Act Number 8 Year 1999 about Consumer Protection

机译:消费者纠纷解决机构根据1999年第8号《消费者保护法》解决消费者纠纷的合法性

获取原文
           

摘要

Based on article 1 subsection (1) of Act Number 8 Year 1999, government forms Consumer Disputes Resolution Agency (CDRA) in region level II (regency/city) to solve consumer disputes outside court. Forming of CDRA is expected may give protection to the consumer in solving the dispute efficiently, quickly, cheaply and professionally. But there is a bias in management of CDRA in Act Number 8 Year 1999 and causing conflict among norms inside the act, causing legitimation of CDRA becomes weak. Moreover, the problem of the study is appearing or looking for legitimation of institution and authority of CDRA in solving the consumer dispute based on Act Number 8 Year 1999 about Consumer Protection.The method used in this study is normative study focused on law institution. The approach used in this study is act approach and conceptual approach. Based on the study that the legitimation of CDRA in solving the dispute consumer outside court has weak basis, because Article 4 subsection (1) Act Number 8 Year 1999 says law basis of CDRA forming has bias /unclear, deal with government authority who has the authority to form CDRA, and kind of Act in CDRA forming. Moreover, no implementing regulation from Article 49 subsection (1) Act Number 8 Year 1999, causing law emptiness about mechanism of CDRA forming in region. Then, CDRA authority in Article 52 Act Number 8 Year 1999 valued over the main authority given Article 49 subsection (1) Act Number 8 year 1999, who only gives authority to CDRA to solve consumer dispute. As a result the legitimation of CDRA as a board of dispute solving for consumer outside court becomes illegitimated.
机译:根据1999年第8号法令第1条第(1)款,政府在地区II(辖区/城市)成立了消费者纠纷解决机构(CDRA),以解决法院外的消费者纠纷。预期CDRA的成立可以为消费者提供有效,快速,廉价和专业的解决纠纷的保护。但是,在1999年第8号法案中,对CDRA的管理存在偏差,并导致该法案内的规范之间发生冲突,导致CDRA的合法性变得很弱。而且,该研究的问题正在出现,或者是在根据1999年第8号《消费者保护法》解决消费者纠纷时,寻求CDRA的机构和权限的合法性。本研究中使用的方法是针对法律制度的规范性研究。本研究中使用的方法是行为方法和概念方法。基于CDRA在解决法院外争议消费者方面的合法性基础薄弱的研究,因为第4条第1款(1999年第8号法案)说CDRA形成的法律基础存在偏见/不清楚,应与具有形成CDRA的权限以及CDRA形成中的某种行为。此外,没有1999年第8号法令第49条第(1)款的实施条例,导致该地区CDRA形成机制的法律空白。然后,根据1999年第8号法案第52条中的CDRA权限,相对于根据1999年第8号法案第49条第(1)款规定的主要权限,该权限仅授予CDRA解决消费者纠纷的权限。结果,将CDRA合法化为法院外消费者解决争议委员会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号