首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Laboratory Physicians >Evaluation of antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass and fluorapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams as a cellular scaffold of bone tissue
【24h】

Evaluation of antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass and fluorapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams as a cellular scaffold of bone tissue

机译:羟基磷灰石/生物活性玻璃和氟磷灰石/生物活性玻璃纳米复合泡沫作为骨组织细胞支架的抗菌性能评估

获取原文
           

摘要

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Infection is a serious problem for patients after implantation surgery, which is difficult to treat with antibiotic therapy. The present study was developed to evaluate and compare the antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass (HA/BG) and fluorapatite/bioactive glass (FA/BG) nanocomposite foams as a cellular scaffold for use in bone defects by two macrodilution and disk diffusion methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis , and Streptococcus mutans were cultured in brain heart infusion broth medium with nanocomposite powder for 5 days, and their bioactivity levels were evaluated by daily culturing on solid agar medium plates. To carry out the disk diffusion test, a disc form of nanocomposite foams was used on agar medium with 48 h incubation. RESULTS: None of two nanocomposites even at their highest concentration (200 mg/mL) did not prevent the growth of two Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis microorganisms. However, HA/BG nanocomposite on the 3rd day at a concentration of 200 mg/mL and on 4th and 5th day at a concentration of 100 mg/mL and FA/BG nanocomposite on the 4th day at a concentration of 100 mg/mL and on the 5th day at a concentration of 50 mg/mL could be able to kill Streptococcus mutans microorganism. In the disc diffusion test, none of the nanocomposites could create a nongrowth zone. Both tested biomaterials showed increased antibacterial properties over time and concentration increase. CONCLUSION: HA/BG and FA/BG nanocomposites, due to their biocompatibility and antimicrobial properties, are good choices for implantation instead of damaged bone tissue in tissue engineering.
机译:目的和目的:对于植入手术后的患者,感染是一个严重的问题,很难用抗生素治疗。本研究旨在评估和比较羟基磷灰石/生物活性玻璃(HA / BG)和氟磷灰石/生物活性玻璃(FA / BG)纳米复合泡沫作为细胞支架的抗菌性能,通过两种宏观稀释和圆盘扩散方法。材料与方法:将金黄色葡萄球菌,粪肠球菌和变形链球菌在含纳米复合粉的脑心浸液培养液中培养5天,并通过每天在固体琼脂培养基板上培养来评估其生物活性水平。为了进行圆盘扩散测试,在琼脂培养基上孵育48小时后,使用圆盘形式的纳米复合泡沫材料。结果:即使在最高浓度(200 mg / mL)下,两种纳米复合材料都不能阻止两种金黄色葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌微生物的生长。但是,HA / BG纳米复合材料在第3天的浓度为200 mg / mL,第4天和第5天以100 mg / mL的浓度合成,FA / BG纳米复合物在第4天的浓度为100 mg / mL,在第5天以50 mg / mL的浓度可以杀死变形链球菌微生物。在圆盘扩散测试中,没有一种纳米复合材料可以形成非生长区。两种经过测试的生物材料均显示出随着时间的推移抗菌性能增强,浓度增加。结论:由于HA / BG和FA / BG纳米复合材料具有生物相容性和抗菌特性,因此它们是植入的理想选择,而不是组织工程中受损的骨组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号