首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Kathmandu Medical College >Rocuronium versus Vecuronium for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
【24h】

Rocuronium versus Vecuronium for laparoscopic cholecystectomy

机译:罗库溴铵与维库溴铵进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia using Vecuronium is quite common these days. Some alarming complications like severe bradycardia and asystole after creation of carboperitoneum is not uncommon after its injection which is very stressful to both surgeons and anaesthesiologists. As an alternative, Rocuronium has been found safe in this regard till now used in many general anaesthesia requiring cases. So, it can be useful in laparoscopic cholecystectomy as well.Objective: To compare the haemodynamic, respiratory parameters and complications between Vecuronium and Rocuronium.Methods: In this randomised prospective double blind study conducted at Kathmandu Medical College from March 2013 to September 2013, a total of sixty patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I and II planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into two groups of thirty each by envelope method, with one group receiving Rocuronium and the other group receiving Vecuronium as muscle relaxants. Group A received injection Pethidine 1 mg/kg, Propofol 2.5 mg/kg and Vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg for induction. Group B received injection Pethidine 1 mg/kg, Propofol 2.5 mg/kg and Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg for induction. After intubation the whole anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen, air, halothane and intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Intraoperative monitoring used were Pulse rate (PR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial Oxygen saturation (SpO2), end tidal Carbondioxide (ETCO2), electro cardiography (ECG) and peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS). PR, MAP, SpO2, ETCO2, ECG were recorded before muscle relaxant, one minute after muscle relaxant, before intubation, one minute after intubation, before skin incision, one minute after skin incision, before carboperitonium, one minute after carboperitoneum, before extubation and one minute after extubation. Carboperitoneum if occurred any were also noted. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS 19 verson. Student t test, Fisher’s exact test and Chi square test were used for the final analysis where P value <0.05 was considered significant.Result: Using Vecuronium as a muscle relaxant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in haemodynamic alteration intraoperatively by a significant reduction of PR one minute after carboperitoneum (62.80±11.25 versus 87.23±14.35 in Rocuronium group) where p<0.05. Bradycardia requiring Atropine was significant in vecuronium group with p<0.05.Conclusion: Rocuronium is less likely to cause bradycardia as compared to Vecuronium in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jkmc.v2i4.11776Journal of Kathmandu Medical CollegeVol. 2, No. 4, Issue 6, Oct.-Dec., 2013Page: 190-195
机译:背景:目前,使用维库溴铵在全身麻醉下进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术非常普遍。注射通气后严重的心动过缓和心搏停止等一些令人震惊的并发症在注射后并不少见,这对外科医师和麻醉医师都非常压力。作为替代方案,迄今为止已发现罗库溴铵在这方面是安全的,迄今为止已用于许多需要全身麻醉的病例。目的:比较维库溴铵和维库溴铵的血液动力学,呼吸参数和并发症。方法:在2013年3月至2013年9月于加德满都医学院进行的这项随机前瞻性双盲研究中,计划将腹腔镜胆囊切除术的美国麻醉学会(ASA)的I型和II型身体状况的60例患者按包膜法随机分为两组,每组30例,一组接受罗库溴铵,另一组接受维库溴铵作为肌肉松弛剂。 A组接受1 mg / kg的哌替啶,2.5 mg / kg的异丙酚和0.1 mg / kg的维库溴铵注射液进行诱导。 B组接受诱导剂量为1 mg / kg的哌替丁,2.5 mg / kg的异丙酚和0.6 mg / kg的罗库溴铵注射液。插管后,用氧气,空气,氟烷和间歇性正压通气维持整个麻醉。术中监测使用的是脉搏率(PR),平均动脉压(MAP),动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2),潮气末二氧化碳(ETCO2),心电图(ECG)和周围神经刺激器(PNS)。在肌肉松弛剂之前,肌肉松弛剂之后1分钟,插管之前,插管之后1分钟,皮肤切开之前,皮肤切口之后1分钟,碳腹膜前1分钟,碳腹膜后1分钟,拔管前以及拔管后一分钟。如果出现任何情况,也要注意。使用SPSS 19版本进行统计分析。最终分析使用了学生t检验,Fisher精确检验和卡方检验,其中P值<0.05被认为是显着的。结果:使用维库溴铵作为腹腔镜胆囊切除术的肌肉松弛剂会导致术中血流动力学改变,显着降低PR一分钟碳腹膜炎后(62.80±11.25 vs.罗库溴铵组为87.23±14.35),其中p <0.05。维库溴铵组中需要阿托品的心动过缓显着,p <0.05。结论:与腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的维库溴铵相比,罗库溴铵较维库溴铵更不易引起心动过缓。加德满都医学院学报2,第4期,第6期,2013年10月至12月页:190-195

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号