首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >A routine blood test-associated predictive model and application for tuberculosis diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study from northwest China
【24h】

A routine blood test-associated predictive model and application for tuberculosis diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study from northwest China

机译:常规血液测试相关预测模型及其在结核病诊断中的应用:一项来自中国西北地区的回顾性队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives This study aimed to use the results of routine blood tests and relevant parameters to construct models for the prediction of active tuberculosis (ATB) and drug-resistant tuberculosis (DRTB) and to assess the diagnostic values of these models. Methods We performed logistic regression analysis to generate models of plateletcrit-albumin scoring (PAS) and platelet distribution width-treatment-sputum scoring (PTS). Area under the curve (AUC) analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic values of these curves. Finally, we performed model validation and application assessment. Results In the training cohort, for the PAS model, the AUC for diagnosing ATB was 0.902, sensitivity was 82.75%, specificity was 82.20%, accuracy rate was 81.00%, and optimal threshold value was 0.199. For the PTS model, the AUC for diagnosing DRTB was 0.700, sensitivity was 63.64%, specificity was 73.53%, accuracy rate was 89.00%, and optimal threshold value was ?2.202. These two models showed significant differences in the AUC analysis, compared with single-factor models. Results in the validation cohort were similar. Conclusions The PAS model had high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ATB, and the PTS model had strong predictive potential for the diagnosis of DRTB.
机译:目的本研究旨在利用常规血液检查的结果和相关参数来构建预测活动性结核病(ATB)和耐药性结核病(DRTB)的模型,并评估这些模型的诊断价值。方法我们进行了逻辑回归分析,生成血小板计数-白蛋白评分(PAS)和血小板分布宽度-治疗-痰评分(PTS)模型。使用曲线下面积(AUC)分析来分析这些曲线的诊断值。最后,我们进行了模型验证和应用评估。结果在训练队列中,对于PAS模型,用于诊断ATB的AUC为0.902,敏感性为82.75%,特异性为82.20%,准确率为81.00%,最佳阈值为0.199。对于PTS模型,诊断DRTB的AUC为0.700,灵敏度为63.64%,特异性为73.53%,准确率为89.00%,最佳阈值为2.220。与单因素模型相比,这两个模型在AUC分析中显示出显着差异。验证队列中的结果相似。结论PAS模型对ATB的诊断具有较高的敏感性和特异性,而PTS模型对DRTB的诊断具有较强的预测潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号