...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Investment and Management >Integrating activity-based costing with economic value added
【24h】

Integrating activity-based costing with economic value added

机译:将基于活动的成本核算与经济附加值相结合

获取原文
           

摘要

Activity-Based Costing (ABC) was developed in the mid 1980s by Kaplan and it has been applied very popular in developed countries with obvious advantages. Although ABC system has more advantages than traditional costing (TC) system, but in today's competitive economic environment it has not met fulfilled provision of sufficient information for decision-making, especially single ABC method ignores capital cost. The lack of capital cost is the reason why some products have inaccurate product costs and as results of that they have profit under ABC method but when capital cost is charged to those products, they cause a loss because they consume high invest fund. Imprecise information provided by single ABC method to managers is the reason why managers make inaccurate decisions. How to overcome this limitation of ABC? This paper researches on the integration of ABC with Economic Value Added (EVA) as one way to overcome its limitation and innovation management accounting. Based on the data provided by Dong Su Company, this paper calculated profits of two customer groups using the new methodology (EVA-ABC) and also the old methodology (single ABC) to show how vague or inaccurate is the results you get when you use the old methodology and how accurate is the results you get when using the new methodology. The calculation showed that under EVA-ABC group 1 generates the value (13%) for this company but group 2 reduces the value of the business and destroy its capital (-8%). However under the single ABC method, the calculation showed that both two customer groups create profits for Dong Su with profit rate are 20% and 4% respectively which was incorrect.
机译:作业成本法(ABC)由卡普兰(Kaplan)于1980年代中期开发,并已在发达国家中得到广泛应用,并具有明显的优势。尽管ABC系统比传统的成本核算(TC)系统具有更多的优势,但是在当今竞争激烈的经济环境中,它无法满足为决策提供充分的信息提供的需求,尤其是单一的ABC方法忽略了资本成本。缺乏资本成本是某些产品的产品成本不准确的原因,并导致它们在ABC方法下获利,但当这些产品记入资本成本时,由于消耗大量投资资金,它们会造成损失。单一ABC方法向管理者提供的信息不准确是管理者做出错误决策的原因。如何克服ABC的这一局限性?本文研究了ABC与经济增值(EVA)的集成,以克服其局限性和创新管理会计。根据东苏公司提供的数据,本文使用新方法(EVA-ABC)和旧方法(单个ABC)计算了两个客户组的利润,以显示使用时获得的结果有多模糊或不准确旧方法,以及使用新方法时得到的结果有多准确。计算表明,在EVA-ABC下,第1组为该公司创造了价值(13%),但第2组降低了业务价值并破坏了其资本(-8%)。但是,根据单一的ABC方法,计算结果表明两个客户组都为Dong Su创造了利润,利润率分别为20%和4%,这是不正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号