首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Clinical profile of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease: Comparison with chronic fibrosing idiopathic interstitial pneumonias
【24h】

Clinical profile of unclassifiable interstitial lung disease: Comparison with chronic fibrosing idiopathic interstitial pneumonias

机译:无法分类的间质性肺疾病的临床特征:与慢性纤维化特发性间质性肺炎的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common problem in clinical practice. These patients pose a distinct challenge with regard to appropriate evaluation and management. We investigated the clinical features and prognosis of unclassifiable ILD and compared its clinical profile with that of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). Methods Patients with IPF (n?=?40), NSIP (n?=?14), and unclassifiable ILD (n?=?27) were selected from an ongoing database. Baseline clinical features, pulmonary function, and the extent of fibrosis on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were evaluated. Mortality was estimated based on the ILD–Gender, Age, Physiology (ILD-GAP) index and composite physiologic index (CPI). Results IPF was associated with the worst survival (hazard ratio [HR]?=?4.361 compared with NSIP), followed by unclassifiable cases (HR?=?1.251 compared with NSIP). Increasing mortality was significantly impacted by age (HR?=?1.04 per 1-year increase), lower carbon monoxide diffusing capacity of the lung (HR?=?0.97), HRCT interstitial score (HR?=?1.119 per 1-point increase), ILD-GAP score (HR?=?1.570 per 1-point increase), and CPI (HR?=?1.039 per 1-point increase). Conclusions Patients with unclassifiable ILD had an intermediate prognosis between that of IPF and NSIP. Patients at high risk of mortality can be identified using baseline clinical, physiological, and radiological features.
机译:目的无法分类的间质性肺疾病(ILD)是临床实践中的常见问题。这些患者在适当的评估和管理方面构成了明显的挑战。我们调查了无法分类的ILD的临床特征和预后,并将其与特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和特发性非特异性间质性肺炎(NSIP)进行了比较。方法从持续进行的数据库中选择IPF(n = 40),NSIP(n = 14)和无法分类的ILD(n = 27)的患者。评估了基线临床特征,肺功能和高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)上的纤维化程度。根据ILD性别,年龄,生理学(ILD-GAP)指数和综合生理学指数(CPI)估算死亡率。结果IPF与最差的生存率相关(危险比[HR]?=?4.361,与NSIP相比),其次是无法分类的病例(HR?=?1.251,与NSIP相比)。死亡率的增加受到年龄(HR增加=?1.04每增加1年),肺中一氧化碳扩散能力降低(HR增加=?0.97),HRCT间质评分(HR增加=?1.119每增加1点)的显着影响。 ),ILD-GAP得分(每增加1分,HR≥1.570)和CPI(每增加1分的HR≥1.039)。结论不能分类的ILD患者的预后介于IPF和NSIP之间。可以使用基线临床,生理和放射学特征来确定高死亡风险的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号