首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Management and Sustainability >How Can One Get Ahead in the Contemporary Labour Market of China? — Examining the Changing Stratification Mechanisms through Job-Attainment Patterns
【24h】

How Can One Get Ahead in the Contemporary Labour Market of China? — Examining the Changing Stratification Mechanisms through Job-Attainment Patterns

机译:一个人如何在中国当代劳动力市场上遥遥领先? —通过工作成就模式研究不断变化的分层机制

获取原文
       

摘要

Using the 2003 China General Social Survey data, this study explores the changing stratification mechanisms in transitional China by examining the relative importance of three job-attainment channels, namely, state-led hiring, market-led hiring, and guanxi -led hiring. I argue that the labour market of post-socialist China is co-stratified by political power and the market. These two forces have achieved an equilibrium in which market strength is subject to political power. Firstly, the increasingly importance of education is not due to the emergence of the market, because state-led hiring has even stricter educational criteria. Guanxi is no longer a driving force of stratification, since guanxi -led hiring is more utilized by the disadvantaged. Second, an increasing tendency of market-led and guanxi-led hirings accompanied by a decline of state-led hiring is evident, over time and across space. Thus, new opportunity structures have indeed expanded, making it possible to move upwards outside of the state-controlled system. Third, Quantile Regression estimations show that the dominance of political power penetrates from the lowest to highest social stratum, so that being hired by the state-controlled channel is the most likely means of upward mobility. The market channel pays off only for the top social stratum.
机译:本研究使用2003年中国社会综合调查数据,通过考察国家主导的招聘,市场主导的招聘和关系主导的招聘这三种工作成就渠道的相对重要性,探索了转型中的中国不断变化的分层机制。我认为,后社会主义中国的劳动力市场是由政治权力和市场共同分层的。这两股力量已达到平衡,在这种平衡中,市场实力受制于政治力量。首先,教育的日益重要不是由于市场的出现,因为国家主导的招聘甚至具有更严格的教育标准。关系型不再是分层的驱动力,因为关系型领导的雇用更多地由弱势群体利用。其次,随着时间的推移和跨空间的变化,市场主导和关系主导的招聘呈上升趋势,而国家主导的招聘则呈下降趋势。因此,新的机会结构确实得到了扩展,从而有可能向上移动到国家控制系统之外。第三,分位数回归估计表明,政治权力的主导地位从最低到最高的社会阶层渗透,因此由国家控制的渠道雇用是最可能的向上流动的手段。市场渠道只会为最高的社会阶层带来回报。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号