首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology >A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration by using a collagen membrane with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of infrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study

机译:使用或不使用脱钙的冻干同种异体骨胶原膜治疗引导下组织再生的有效性的比较评估:临床和放射学研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The present, randomized, controlled clinical and radiographic study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) by using a collagen membrane barrier with or without decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects characterized by unfavorable architecture.Materials and Methods:Sixteen systemically healthy patients with 20 periodontal infrabony defects were selected for the study. Each patient had at least ≥ 5 mm clinical probing pocket depth (PPD) at the selected site and depth of intrabony component ≥ 3 mm as assessed by clinical and radiographic measurements. Baseline measurements included plaque index, papillary bleeding index, PPD, gingival recession, clinical attachment level and radiographic defect depth (DD). At the time of surgery, the defects were randomly assigned to either the test group (collagen membrane plus DFDBA) or the control group (collagen membrane only).Results:At the 6-month examination, PPPD reduction was significantly greater in the GTR + DFDBA group (4.06 ± 0.38 mm) compared with the GTR group (3.2 ± 0.74 mm). The mean gains of clinical attachment were 3.54 ± 0.36 mm in the test group and 2.50 ± 0.74 mm in the control group. Radiographic DD reduction was similarly greater in the GTR + DFDBA group (2.40 ± 0.51 mm) compared with the GTR group (1.60 ± 0.51 mm).Conclusions:The results of the present study indicate that the use of a GTR membrane with bone graft has significantly improved all clinical parameters tested as compared with the use of bioresorbable membrane alone in the treatment of infrabony defects characterized by unfavorable architecture.
机译:背景:目前进行了一项随机,对照,临床和放射学对照研究,以比较使用或不使用脱钙冻干同种异体骨移植(DFDBA)的胶原膜屏障在治疗牙周骨缺损中的引导组织再生(GTR)的有效性。材料与方法:选择16例系统健康的20例牙周骨下缺损患者。每位患者在选定部位的临床探查袋深度(PPD)至少为≥5 mm,并且骨内成分的深度通过临床和X线照相测量评估为≥3 mm。基线测量包括斑块指数,乳头出血指数,PPD,牙龈退缩,临床依从水平和影像学缺陷深度(DD)。手术时,将缺陷随机分配到测试组(胶原膜加DFDBA)或对照组(仅胶原膜)。结果:在6个月的检查中,GTR + DFDBA组(4.06±0.38 mm)与GTR组(3.2±0.74 mm)相比。试验组的临床依恋平均收益为3.54±0.36 mm,对照组为2.50±0.74 mm。与GTR组(1.60±0.51 mm)相比,GTR + DFDBA组的放射线DD减少量(2.40±0.51 mm)相似。结论:本研究结果表明,将GTR膜与骨移植一起使用具有显着效果。与单独使用生物可吸收膜治疗以结构不利为特征的骨骼下缺损相比,该方法显着改善了所有测试的临床参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号