首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology >A clinical and radiological evaluation of the relative efficacy of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft versus anorganic bovine bone xenograft in the treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects: A 6 months follow-up study
【24h】

A clinical and radiological evaluation of the relative efficacy of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft versus anorganic bovine bone xenograft in the treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects: A 6 months follow-up study

机译:脱盐冻干同种异体骨移植与无机牛骨异种移植相对治疗人下颌骨牙周缺损的相对疗效的临床和放射学评估:6个月的随访研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:The ultimate goal of periodontal therapy entails regeneration of the periodontal tissues lost as a consequence of periodontitis. Predictable correction of vertical osseous defects has however posed as a constant therapeutic challenge. The aim of our present study is to evaluate the relative efficacy of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) vs anorganic bovine bone xenograft (ABBX) in the treatment of human infrabony periodontal defects.Materials and Methods:15 patients with 30 bilaterally symmetrical defect sites in either of the arches, in the age group of 25-50 years were selected as part of split-mouth study design. Defect-A (right side) was grafted with DFDBA while Defect-B (left side) was grafted with ABBX. Various clinical and radiographic parameters viz. probing depth(PD), clinical attachment level(CAL) and linear bone fill were recorded preoperatively, 12- & 24-weeks postoperatively.Results:Both defect-A & defect-B sites exhibited a highly significant reduction in probing depth, and gain in clinical attachment level and linear bone fill at 12-weeks & at the end of 24-weeks. Comparative evaluation between the study groups revealed a statistically non-significant reduction in probing depth (P<0.1) and mean gain in linear bone fill (P<0.1). However, there was a statistically significant gain in clinical attachment level (P<0.05) in Defect-A (CD=0.356) as compared to Defect-B (CD=0.346).Conclusions:Within the limits of this study, both the materials viz. ABBX and DFDBA are beneficial for the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects. Both the materials were found to be equally effective in all respects except the gain in attachment level, which was found to be more with DFDBA. Long-term studies are suggested to evaluate further the relative efficacy of the two grafts.
机译:背景:牙周治疗的最终目标是再生由于牙周炎而丧失的牙周组织。然而,垂直骨缺损的可预测矫正一直是治疗上的挑战。本研究的目的是评估脱矿质冻干同种异体骨移植(DFDBA)与无机牛异种异体骨(ABBX)在治疗人下颌骨牙周缺损中的相对疗效。材料与方法:15例30例双侧对称性缺损30例年龄在25至50岁之间的任一拱门中的遗址均被选为裂口研究设计的一部分。缺陷A(右侧)移植了DFDBA,而缺陷B(左侧)移植了ABBX。各种临床和射线照相参数。术前,术后12和24周记录探查深度(PD),临床附着水平(CAL)和线性骨充盈。结果:缺陷A和缺陷B位点均显着降低了探查深度和增益在12周和24周结束时的临床依附水平和线性骨填充。研究组之间的比较评估显示,探测深度(P <0.1)和线性骨填充的平均增幅(P <0.1)在统计学上无显着降低。然而,与缺陷-B(CD = 0.346)相比,缺陷-A(CD = 0.356)的临床依从水平有统计学意义的提高(P <0.05)。结论:在本研究的范围内,两种材料即ABBX和DFDBA对治疗牙周下骨缺损有益。发现两种材料在所有方面都具有同等效力,除了附件级别的提高(对于DFDBA而言更是如此)。建议进行长期研究,以进一步评估两种移植物的相对功效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号