...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology: official organ of the International Association of Asthmology (INTERASMA) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Alergia e Inmunologie >A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of Ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to laratadine 10 mg once daily in tye treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
【24h】

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of Ebastine (20 mg and 10 mg) to laratadine 10 mg once daily in tye treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

机译:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究,比较了依巴斯汀(20毫克和10毫克)与拉拉他定10毫克(每天一次)在季节性变应性鼻炎治疗中的疗效和安全性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Few randomized studies have compared the H1-receptor antagonists loratadine and ebastine in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ebastine 20 mg (E20), ebastine 10 mg (E10), loratadine 10 mg (L10), and placebo (P), once daily, in controlling symptoms of SAR over a 4-week period. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study. Efficacy was assessed in 749 patients (12 to 70 years old) by SAR symptom scores (nasal discharge, congestion, itching, sneezing, and total eye symptoms) entered on diary cards every morning and every evening over the previous 12 hours (reflective score) and at the time of recording (snapshot score). The E20 group showed greater reductions from baseline compared with the L10 group in 2 daily reflective composite scores (nasal index [with or without congestion]) and in all4 daily snapshot composite scores. E10 and L10 groups showed no significant differences in either the daily reflective or snapshot scores overall although E10 showed a greater improvement of nasal discharge snapshot score than L10. The efficacy of E20 at controlling the symptoms of SAR was well sustained during the fourth week of treatment, with significant differences over placebo in 22/36 total rhinitis symptom scores, followed by E10 (6/36), whereas L10 showed no differences (0/36). Patient and physician global evaluations at the final visit were not statistically significant for any treatment group compared with placebo. There was no significant differenceamong all groups in the number of patients who reported adverse events. In conclusion, ebastine 20 mg given once daily for 4 weeks in the treatment of SAR showed larger mean reductions from baseline in most rhinitis symptoms scores than loratadine 10 mg. Sustained efficacy was most frequently observed with ebastine 20 mg over placebo, whereas loratadine 10 mg did not provide a statistically significant improvement in any individual or composite symptom score at the end of the fourth week. Both ebastine 20 and 10 mg were well tolerated and proved safe in the treatment of SAR.Key words: Antihistamines - Clinical trial - Ebastine - Loratadine - Seasonal allergic rhinitis
机译:很少有随机研究比较过季节性过敏性鼻炎(SAR)患者中的H1受体拮抗剂氯雷他定和依巴斯汀。这项研究的目的是比较每天两次使用依巴斯汀20 mg(E20),依巴斯汀10 mg(E10),氯雷他定10 mg(L10)和安慰剂(P)在控制SAR症状方面的功效和安全性。 4周。这是一项双盲,安慰剂对照,随机分组的平行研究。根据SAR症状评分(流鼻涕,充血,瘙痒,打喷嚏和总眼部症状)在每天12小时内和每天前12天每天晚上在日记卡上评估的749名患者(12至70岁)的疗效(反射评分)并在录制时(快照分数)。与L10组相比,E20组在2个每日反射综合评分(鼻指数[有或无充血])和所有4个每日快照综合评分中均较L10组降低了更多。 E10和L10组的总体每日反射或快照分数均无显着差异,尽管E10的鼻分泌快照分数较L10有更大的改善。在治疗的第四周,E20控制SAR症状的效果一直很好,与安慰剂相比,总鼻炎症状评分在22/36上有显着差异,其次是E10(6/36),而L10无差异(0 / 36)。与安慰剂相比,任何治疗组在最终访视时对患者和医生的整体评估均无统计学意义。在所有组中,报告不良事件的患者数量没有显着差异。总之,在治疗SAR的过程中,每天服用一次4周的依巴斯汀20 mg,与氯雷他定10 mg相比,在大多数鼻炎症状评分中均显示出较基线平均降低幅度更大。依巴斯汀20 mg较安慰剂最常观察到持续疗效,而氯雷他定10 mg在第4周末对任何个体或复合症状评分均无统计学意义的改善。依巴斯汀20 mg和10 mg耐受性良好,并被证明可治疗SAR。关键词:抗组胺药-临床试验-依巴斯汀-氯雷他定-季节性过敏性鼻炎

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号