首页> 外文期刊>Journal of industrial pollution control >DIGITAL PETROPHYSICS AND STANDARD LABORATORY METHODS FOR DETERMINING TERRIGENOUS CONTAINER ROCKS CAPACITIVE PROPERTIES
【24h】

DIGITAL PETROPHYSICS AND STANDARD LABORATORY METHODS FOR DETERMINING TERRIGENOUS CONTAINER ROCKS CAPACITIVE PROPERTIES

机译:数字石油物理和标准实验室方法确定陆源性容器岩石的电容特性

获取原文
           

摘要

At the moment, the actual direction in the chain of petrophysical drill sample analysis is an approach called "Digital core-sample" or "Digital petrophysics". However, the majority of Russian oil and gas industry companies prefer traditional methods of laboratory analysis, due to the lack of information about the possibilities of this approach. Comparative characteristics of the established laboratory methods effectiveness for determining terrigenous container rocks’ capacitive properties (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Preobrazhensky method; Gas Volumetric method) with the method of computer microtomography (micro-CT). Getting recommendations in the selection of test methods of open porosity evaluation in non-standard collectors – with low filtration properties to 1 mD and containing high-viscosity oils and bitumen. The open porosity (FVF) in helium was determined by the "Coretestsystems" company permeameter-porosimeter AR-608; FVF was determined by a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) – Spectrometer Chromatec 20M, manufactured by ZAO SKB "Chromatec"; by Preobrazhensky method – according to the procedure, in the laboratory. FVF was determined by micro-CT method of "Bruker microCT" company’s microtomograph – SkyScan 1172. Comparative analysis of methods for determining container rocks’ capacitive properties has shown that standard laboratory techniques: Preobrazhensky method, Gas Volumetric Method are affordable, effective and simple. However, in the case of determining of open porosity in low-permeability container rocks containing highviscosity oil qualitative sample preparation cannot be conducted. As a result, the FVF values are underestimated. The most effective methods in the unconventional container rocks’ analysis are Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and computer microtomography. In case of a clay material high content in the container rocks, the nuclear magnetic resonance method does not give reliable results. This is confirmed by modern Russian scientists and present experimental work.
机译:目前,岩石物理钻探样品分析链中的实际方向是一种称为“数字岩心样品”或“数字石油物理学”的方法。但是,由于缺乏有关这种方法的可能性的信息,大多数俄罗斯石油和天然气工业公司更喜欢传统的实验室分析方法。建立的实验室方法与计算机显微断层摄影术(micro-CT)的比较特性,可以有效确定陆生容器岩石的电容特性(核磁共振,Preobrazhensky方法;气体体积法)。在非标准收集器中选择开放性孔隙度评估测试方法的方法中获得建议-过滤性能低至1 mD,并包含高粘度油和沥青。氦气中的开孔率(FVF)由“ Coretestsystems”公司的渗透率-孔度计AR-608确定; FVF由ZAO SKB“ Chromatec”制造的核磁共振(NMR)光谱仪Chromatec 20M确定;通过Preobrazhensky方法–根据步骤,在实验室中进行。 FVF是由“布鲁克MicroCT”公司的显微断层扫描仪SkyScan 1172的Micro-CT方法确定的。确定容器岩石的电容特性的方法的比较分析表明,标准的实验室技术:Preobrazhensky方法,Gas Volumetric方法可负担,有效且简单。但是,在确定低渗透率容器中的开孔率的情况下,不能进行含有高粘度油质样品制备的岩石。结果,FVF值被低估了。非常规容器岩石分析中最有效的方法是核磁共振和计算机显微断层扫描。如果容器岩石中的粘土材料含量高,则核磁共振方法无法提供可靠的结果。现代俄罗斯科学家证实了这一点,并提出了目前的实验工作。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号