...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of International Medical Research >Comparison of Dual X-ray Laser and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Techniques of Osteodensitometry
【24h】

Comparison of Dual X-ray Laser and Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Techniques of Osteodensitometry

机译:双X射线激光与双能量X射线骨密度测定法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Dual X-ray laser (DXL) heel measurements of bone mineral density (BMD) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) total hip and lumbar spine BMD measurements were compared for their ability to detect osteoporosis and osteopenia according to World Health Organization criteria. The study included 164 women aged 40–83 years. DXL heel measurements were recorded for all patients and 89 of the women underwent DEXA. For DXL heel measurements/DEXA lumbar spine measurements, the relative sensitivity was 50%, relative specificity was 97% and relative reliability (Kappa score) was 0.55 for osteoporosis detection. For detecting osteoporosis or osteopenia, the relative sensitivity increased to 86% but the relative specificity reduced to 38% and the relative reliability was considerably lower (Kappa score 0.21). Although previous studies have shown DXL heel measurement to be a good technique in the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis based on BMD, particularly for fast, cost-effective bone scanning, we suggest that there are currently insufficient data to prove its use as a standard measurement technique for BMD.
机译:根据世界卫生组织的标准比较了骨密度(BMD)和双能X线骨密度仪(DEXA)的双X射线激光(DXL)足跟测量值,以及根据世界卫生组织的标准对髋和腰椎总BMD值进行检测的能力。该研究纳入了164位40-83岁的女性。记录了所有患者的DXL足跟测量,其中89位妇女接受了DEXA治疗。对于DXL足跟测量/ DEXA腰椎测量,骨质疏松症检测的相对灵敏度为50%,相对特异性为97%,相对可靠性(Kappa评分)为0.55。为了检测骨质疏松症或骨质减少症,相对灵敏度提高到86%,但相对特异性降低到38%,相对可靠性大大降低(Kappa评分0.21)。尽管先前的研究表明DXL足跟测量是基于BMD的骨质疏松症诊断和评估的良好技术,特别是对于快速,经济高效的骨扫描,但我们建议目前尚无足够的数据来证明其可作为标准测量方法BMD技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号