首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >Gutta percha verses resilon: An in vitro comparison of fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth
【24h】

Gutta percha verses resilon: An in vitro comparison of fracture resistance in endodontically treated teeth

机译:Gutta percha verses resilon:牙髓治疗牙齿的抗断裂性的体外比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth filled with gutta percha and Resilon using lateral and vertical condensation methods. Materials and Methods: A total of 75 freshly extracted single-rooted teeth were selected. All samples were instrumented with profile 4% Ni-Ti rotary instruments. Samples were randomly divided into five groups of 15 samples each: Group 1 was obturated using lateral condensation with gutta percha and AH -26 sealer. Group 2 was obturated using vertical condensation with gutta-percha and AH-26. Group 3 was obturated with Resilon and epiphany using lateral condensation technique. Group 4 was obturated with Resilon and epiphany using vertical condensation method. Group 5 received no filling. Restored teeth were subjected to compressive loading in a universal testing machine. Results: One-way ANOVA test showed significant difference among the groups (P 0.05). The mean and SD values for the groups are as follows: Group 1 - (773.3 ± 148.1), Group 2 - (769.9 ± 170.5), Group 3 - (928.1 ± 135.4), Group 4 - (902.6 ± 120.8), and Group 5 - (766.0 ± 152.0). It was seen that samples of Group 3 showed the highest fracture resistance followed by Group 4, Group 1, and Group 2. Group 5 showed the least fracture resistance. Conclusion: Resilon-epiphany obturated roots using lateral condensation method showed higher fracture resistance compared with gutta percha-AH 26 groups on vertical loading.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是使用侧向和垂直凝结方法评估和比较经牙髓处理的牙龈充填牙胶和Resilon填充牙的抗断裂性。材料和方法:总共选择了75颗刚拔出的单根牙。所有样品都用轮廓为4%的Ni-Ti旋转仪器进行了仪器测试。将样品随机分为5组,每组15个样品:第1组使用牙龈胶和AH -26封闭剂进行侧向凝结封闭。第2组使用牙胶和AH-26进行垂直凝结封闭。使用侧向凝结技术将第3组用Resilon和主显节封闭。第4组采用垂直凝结法用Resilon和顿悟法封闭。第5组没有填补。修复后的牙齿在万能试验机中承受压缩载荷。结果:单因素方差分析显示各组之间存在显着差异(P <0.05)。各组的平均值和SD值如下:第1组-(773.3±148.1),第2组-(769.9±170.5),第3组-(928.1±135.4),第4组-(902.6±120.8)和第5-(766.0±152.0)。可以看出,第3组的样品显示出最高的抗断裂性,其次是第4组,第1组和第2组。第5组显示出最低的抗断裂性。结论:在垂直荷载下,侧向凝结法使硬生灵主显闭塞的根部具有比牙胶percha-AH 26组更高的抗断裂性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号