首页> 外文期刊>BMC Oral Health >Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots filled with Gutta-percha and Resilon: a meta-analysis of in vitro studies

机译:牙髓充填和Resilon牙髓治疗牙根的垂直断裂阻力的比较评估:体外研究的荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Teeth treated endodontically are more susceptible to vertical root fracture (VRF). Some studies have suggested that obturating the root canals with Gutta-percha or Resilon can reinforce endodontically treated teeth, but a few others have presented conflicting results. These inconsistent results cannot guide clinicians in determining clinical approaches. The objective of this meta-analysis is to evaluate and compare the vertical fracture resistance of endodontically treated root canals obturated with Gutta-percha/AH plus and the Resilon system. Comprehensive literature searches were performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and Embase databases. The titles and abstracts of all of the retrieved articles were independently assessed by two authors according to predefined selection criteria. Data in the included articles were independently extracted. Statistical analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software. The pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcome indicators. The level of statistical significance was set at p?
机译:经牙髓治疗的牙齿更易受垂直牙根骨折(VRF)的影响。一些研究表明,用Gutta-percha或Resilon阻塞牙根管可以增强经牙髓治疗的牙齿,但其他一些研究结果却相互矛盾。这些不一致的结果不能指导临床医生确定临床方法。这项荟萃分析的目的是评估和比较用Gutta-percha / AH plus和Resilon系统封闭的经牙髓治疗的根管的垂直断裂阻力。在PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,ScienceDirect,Web of Science和Embase数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。两位作者根据预定义的选择标准对所有检索到的文章的标题和摘要进行了独立评估。所包含文章中的数据是独立提取的。使用Review Manager 5.3和Stata 12.0软件进行统计分析。计算结果指标的合并标准均值差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CIs)。统计显着性水平设定为p≤0.05。 Cochran Q检验(I2检验)用于检验研究之间的异质性。荟萃分析包括十四项随机对照的体外试验。结果表明,未准备和未填充的根的垂直根抗断裂性显着高于用Gutta-percha / AH加封闭的根(SMD≤0.69,95%CI≤1.34至≤1.3)。 0.04,p = 0.04,或Silon系统(SMD = 0.54,95%CI = 1.07至0.00,p = 0.05)。用Gutta-percha / AH plus填充的牙根与准备好的未填充牙根管之间的抗断裂性差异不显着(SMD≤0.59,95%CI≤0.02至1.21,p≤0.06)。 。用Resilon填充的根比未用仪器填充的根(SMD?=?0.83,95%CI?=?0.44至1.22,p?<?0.0001)或充满Gutta-percha / AH加(SMD?=? 0.62,95%CI≤0.01,至1.23,p≤0.05。目前的研究表明,使用Gutta-percha / AH加一定剂量的填充物不会增强经牙髓治疗的根部,而用Resilon系统封闭可以增加准备好的根部的垂直根部抗断裂性。由于该荟萃分析基于体外研究,因此应谨慎地将其结论外推至临床背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号