首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >Comparative evaluation of salt water rinse with chlorhexidine against oral microbes: A school-based randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of salt water rinse with chlorhexidine against oral microbes: A school-based randomized controlled trial

机译:洗必泰盐水冲洗口腔微生物的比较评估:一项基于学校的随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Mouth rinse that is natural, safe, cost-effective, readily available and culturally acceptable is required as an adjunct to routine tooth brushing to combat dental diseases. The aim of present study was to compare the effectiveness of salt water rinse with chlorhexidine mouth rinse in reducing dental plaque and oral microbial count. Materials and Methods: The Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of salt water against S. mutans, L.acidophilus, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis was determined by Macrobroth Dilution method. Thirty participants were randomly allocated into study group (salt water rinse) and control group (chlorhexidine rinse). Baseline DMFS, defs and plaque scores were recorded. Baseline unstimulated saliva samples were collected by spitting method. Oral prophylaxis was done after baseline sample collection. The participants were advised to rinse the allocated mouthrinse for 5 days under the supervision of co- investigator. Pre- rinse (after oral prophylaxis) and Post –rinse (5th day of mouthrinsing) plaque examination and salivary microbial analysis was done. The collected salivary samples were immediately transported and streaked on the respective media for microbial count. Result: MIC of salt water was 0.7 M for S. mutans, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis and 0.8M for L. acidophilus. There was statistically significant reduction in the plaque scores, salivary S. mutans, L. acidophilus, A. actinomycetemcomitans and P. gingivalis count from baseline, pre-rinse to post-rinse in the study group (p=0.001) and control group (p=0.001). Salt water was as effective as chlorhexidine in reducing dental plaque (p = 0.19) and A. actinomycetemcomitans (p = 0.35) count and while chlorhexidine was superior against S. mutans (p = 0.001), L. acidophilus (p = 0.001) and P. gingivalis (p =0.001). Conclusion: Salt water rinse can be used as adjunct to routine mechanical plaque control for prevention of oral diseases.
机译:背景:自然洗漱,漱口水是自然,安全,具有成本效益,易于获得且在文化上可接受的,是常规漱口水对付牙齿疾病的辅助手段。本研究的目的是比较盐水冲洗和洗必泰漱口水在减少牙菌斑和口腔微生物数量方面的有效性。材料与方法:用Macrobroth稀释法测定盐水对变形链球菌,嗜酸乳杆菌,放线杆菌和齿龈假单胞菌的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。 30名参与者被随机分为研究组(盐水冲洗)和对照组(洗必泰冲洗)。记录基线DMFS,defs和菌斑分数。基线不刺激唾液样品通过分散法收集。基线样本收集后进行口服预防。建议参与者在共同研究者的监督下冲洗分配的漱口水5天。进行了冲洗前(口服预防后)和冲洗后(漱口第5天)的菌斑检查和唾液微生物分析。立即将收集的唾液样品运输并在各自的介质上划线,以进行微生物计数。结果:变形链球菌,放线杆菌和牙龈假单胞菌的盐水MIC为0.7 M,嗜酸乳杆菌的为MIC。在研究组(p = 0.001)和对照组(从清洗前到清洗后),斑块评分,唾液变异链球菌,嗜酸乳杆菌,嗜酸乳杆菌,放线杆菌和齿龈假单胞菌计数从基线,清洗前到清洗后均有显着降低。 p = 0.001)。盐水在减少牙菌斑(p = 0.19)和放线杆菌(P. 0.35)方面与洗必泰一样有效,而洗必泰优于变形链球菌(p = 0.001),嗜酸乳杆菌(p = 0.001)和洗必泰。牙龈卟啉单胞菌(p = 0.001)。结论:盐水冲洗可作为常规机械斑块防治的辅助手段,以预防口腔疾病。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号