...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies >Groundwater methane in a potential coal seam gas extraction region
【24h】

Groundwater methane in a potential coal seam gas extraction region

机译:潜在煤层气开采区的地下水甲烷

获取原文
           

摘要

Highlights ? This study provides baseline groundwater chemistry prior to coal seam gas extraction. ? Methane may trace coal seam gas water mixing with shallow aquifers. ? Methane distribution was best explained by geology in the Richmond River Catchment. ? Stable carbon isotopes revealed variable methane sources in the catchment. Abstract Study region This study investigates dissolved methane distribution in groundwater from the Richmond River Catchment (New South Wales, Australia) before proposed coal seam gas (CSG, or coal bed methane) development. Study focus Unconventional gas exploration has rapidly expanded in recent years. However, the impact of these operations on groundwater systems is poorly understood. A total of 91 groundwater samples were analyzed from 6 geological units. Our observations act as regional baseline research prior to CSG extraction and may assist with long term impact assessment. New hydrological insights for the region Methane was found in all geological units ranging between 0.26 and 4427 μg L ?1 (median 10.68 μg L ?1 ). Median methane concentrations were highest in chloride-type groundwater (13.26 μg L ?1 , n = 58) while bicarbonate-type groundwater had lower concentrations (3.71 μg L ?1 ). Groundwater from alluvial sediments had significantly higher median methane concentrations (91.46 μg L ?1 ) than groundwater from both the basalt aquifers (0.7 μg L ?1 ) and bedrock aquifers (4.63 μg L ?1 ); indicating geology was a major driver of methane distribution. Methane carbon stable isotope ratios ranged from –90.9‰ to –29.5‰, suggesting a biogenic origin with some methane oxidation. No significant correlations were observed between methane concentrations and redox indicators (nitrate, manganese, iron and sulphate) except between iron and methane in the Lismore Basalt ( r 2 = 0.66, p 0.001), implying redox conditions were not the main predictor of methane distribution.
机译:强调 ?这项研究提供了开采煤层气之前的基线地下水化学。 ?甲烷可能会与浅层含水层中的煤层气水混合。 ?里士满河集水区的地质最好地解释了甲烷的分布。 ?稳定的碳同位素揭示了流域中可变的甲烷源。摘要研究区域本研究调查了提议的煤层气(CSG或煤层气)开发之前,里士满河集水区(澳大利亚新南威尔士州)地下水中溶解的甲烷分布。研究重点近年来,非常规天然气勘探迅速发展。但是,这些操作对地下水系统的影响知之甚少。对来自6个地质单位的91个地下水样品进行了分析。我们的观察结果是CSG提取之前的区域基线研究,可能有助于进行长期影响评估。在所有地质单位中,甲烷的新水文见解都在0.26至4427μgL?1(中值10.68μgL?1)之间。氯化物类地下水中的甲烷中位数浓度最高(13.26μgL?1,n = 58),而碳酸氢盐类地下水中的甲烷浓度较低(3.71μgL?1)。冲积沉积物的地下水中位甲烷浓度(91.46μgL?1)明显高于玄武岩含水层(0.7μgL?1)和基岩含水层(4.63μgL?1)的地下水浓度;说明地质是甲烷分布的主要驱动力。甲烷的碳稳定同位素比率范围为–90.9‰至–29.5‰,表明存在甲烷氧化的生物成因。除Lismore玄武岩中的铁与甲烷之间(r 2 = 0.66,p <0.001)外,甲烷浓度与氧化还原指示剂(硝酸盐,锰,铁和硫酸盐)之间没有发现显着的相关性,这表明氧化还原条件不是甲烷的主要预测指标分配。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号