...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of infection and public health. >Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control
【24h】

Rectal swab screening assays of public health importance in molecular diagnostics: Sample adequacy control

机译:在分子诊断中对公共卫生具有重要意义的直肠拭子筛查测定:样品充分性控制

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Rectal swabs are routinely used by public health authorities to screen for multi-drug resistant enteric bacteria including vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Screening sensitivity can be influenced by the quality of the swabbing, whether performed by the patient (self-swabbing) or a healthcare practitioner. One common exclusion criterion for rectal swabs is absence of “visible soiling” from fecal matter. In our institution, this criterion excludes almost 10% of rectal swabs received in the microbiology laboratory. Furthermore, over 30% of patients in whom rectal swabs are cancelled will not be re-screened within the next 48 h, resulting in delays in removing infection prevention measures. We describe two quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based assays, human RNAse P and eubacterial 16S rDNA, which might serve as suitable controls for sampling adequacy. However, lower amounts of amplifiable human DNA make the 16s rDNA assay a better candidate for sample adequacy control.
机译:公共卫生部门通常使用直肠拭子筛查多药耐药的肠细菌,包括耐万古霉素的肠球菌(VRE)和耐碳青霉烯的肠杆菌科(CRE)。擦拭的质量可能受擦拭质量的影响,无论是由患者(自我擦拭)还是从业医生进行。直肠拭子的一种常见排除标准是粪便中没有“可见的污物”。在我们的机构中​​,该标准不包括微生物实验室接受的直肠拭子近10%。此外,超过30%的直肠棉签被取消的患者将在接下来的48小时内不接受重新筛查,从而导致延迟采取预防感染措施。我们描述了两种基于定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)的检测方法,即人RNAse P和真细菌16S rDNA,它们可以用作样品充足性的合适对照。但是,较低量的可扩增人类DNA使16s rDNA分析成为样品充分性控制的更好候选者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号