首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Administration >How to design Lean interventions to enable impact, sustainability and effectiveness. A mixed-method study
【24h】

How to design Lean interventions to enable impact, sustainability and effectiveness. A mixed-method study

机译:如何设计精益干预措施以实现影响,可持续性和有效性。混合方法研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: This study’s aim was to assess how various organisational designs affect Lean interventions’ success. Refinement of design and analytics contributes to the knowledge of organisational change management, and promote sound investment in quality improvement.Methods: A panel of 11 experienced Lean consultants ranked the success of 17 Lean interventions implemented at a university hospital. This was done by assessing their impact on outcome, the sustainability of the improved work processes and the effectiveness regarding degree of goal achievement. The potential relationship between the interventions’ rank, organisation, targets for improvement, and use of time and resources, was analysed by a linear mixed model.Results: 30 percent of the interventions were assessed as successful, 60 percent as moderately successful, and 10 percent as unsuccessful. Employee and safety-staff representation (β 0.22 [CI 0.07–0.37]), top management attendance (β 0.14 [CI 0.10–0.18]), patient-related goals (β 0.13 [CI 0.06–0.20]) and hours in work-groups (β 0.01 [CI 0.00–0.01]) were related to impact on outcome. Interventions that ranged across divisions (β -0.45 [CI -0.75– -0.19]), employee and safety-staff representation (β 0.44 [CI 0.29–0.60]), comprehensive project organisation (β 0.22 [CI 0.08–0.36]) and patient-related goals (β 0.18 [CI 0.11–0.26]) were related to sustainability. Interventions that ranged across divisions (β -1.39 [CI -1.96– -0.81]), comprehensive project organisation (β 0.30 [CI 0.18–0.43]), employee and safety-staff representation (β 0.25 [CI 0.89–0.41]), limited top-management attendance (β -0.18 [CI -0.28– -0.08]), multi-disciplinary teams composed of several professions (β 0.16 [CI 0.08–0.24]) and patient-related goals (β 0.15 [CI 0.04–0.19]) were all related to a higher degree of effectiveness.Conclusions: To achieve quality improvement in hospitals, policymakers are advised to invest in time and a comprehensive project organisation. Furthermore, the interventions should engage multidisciplinary teams including employee and safety-staff representatives and pursue improvement for patients, across divisions. The methods applied constitute a framework for future research.
机译:目的:这项研究的目的是评估各种组织设计如何影响精益干预的成功。设计和分析的完善有助于组织变更管理的知识,并促进对质量改进的可靠投资。方法:由11名经验丰富的精益顾问组成的小组对在大学医院实施的17项精益干预的成功进行了排名。这是通过评估其对结果的影响,改进的工作流程的可持续性以及目标实现程度的有效性来完成的。通过线性混合模型分析了干预措施的等级,组织,改进目标以及时间和资源的使用之间的潜在关系。结果:30%的干预措施被评估为成功,60%的评估为中度成功,10百分比为不成功。员工和安全人员代表(β0.22 [CI 0.07–0.37]),最高管理人员出勤(β0.14 [CI 0.10–0.18]),患者相关目标(β0.13 [CI 0.06-0.20])和工作时间组(β0.01 [CI 0.00–0.01])与对预后的影响有关。干预措施跨部门(β-0.45 [CI -0.75– -0.19]),员工和安全人员代表(β0.44 [CI 0.29–0.60]),综合项目组织(β0.22 [CI 0.08–0.36])和患者相关目标(β0.18 [CI 0.11-0.26])与可持续性相关。跨部门的干预措施(β-1.39 [CI -1.96– -0.81],全面的项目组织(β0.30 [CI 0.18–0.43]),员工和安全人员代表(β0.25 [CI 0.89–0.41]),有限的高层管理人员出席率(β-0.18 [CI -0.28– -0.08],由多个专业组成的多学科团队(β0.16 [CI 0.08–0.24])和与患者相关的目标(β0.15 [CI 0.04–0.19] ])都与更高的有效性有关。结论:为了提高医院的质量,建议政策制定者投入时间并进行全面的项目组织。此外,干预措施应让包括员工和安全人员代表在内的多学科团队参与进来,并为各部门的患者寻求改善。所采用的方法构成了未来研究的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号