首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Hospital Administration >Improving care in surgery – a qualitative study of managers’ experiences of implementing evidence-based practice in the operating room
【24h】

Improving care in surgery – a qualitative study of managers’ experiences of implementing evidence-based practice in the operating room

机译:改善外科护理–对管理人员在手术室中实施循证实践的经验的定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: More knowledge is needed on the preconditions and circumstances for leading implementation of evidence based practice in the operating room (OR). Effective leadership support is critical to enhance the provision of safer care. The aim of this study was to explore managers’ and clinical leaders’ experiences of implementing evidence-based practice to increase patient safety in the operating room.Methods: The study had a qualitative descriptive design. In all, 25 managers were interviewed, with different surgical specialities (orthopedics, general and pediatric surgery) and operating room suites, from eight hospitals and 15 departments.Results: The organizational structures were defined as key obstacles to implementation. Specifically, lack of a common platform for cooperation between managers from different departments, organizational levels and professional groups impeded the alignment of shared goals and directions. In cases where implementation was successful, well-functioning and supportive relationships between the managers from different professions and levels were crucial along with a strong sense of ownership and control over the implementation process. Whilst managers expressed the conviction that safety was an important issue that was supported by top management, the goal was usually to “get through” as many operations as possible. This created conflicts between either prioritizing implementation of safety measures or production goals, which sometimes led to decisions that were counter to evidence-based practice (EBP). While evidence was considered crucial in all implementation efforts, it might be neglected and mistrusted if hierarchical boundaries between professional subgroups were challenged, or if it concerned preventive innovations as opposed to technical innovations.Conclusions: The preconditions for implementing EBP in the OR are suboptimal; thus addressing leadership, organizational and interprofessional barriers are of vital importance.
机译:背景:在手术室(OR)中领先实施循证实践的前提条件和环境需要更多知识。有效的领导支持对于增强提供更安全的护理至关重要。这项研究的目的是探讨管理人员和临床领导者实施循证实践以提高手术室患者安全性的经验。方法:该研究具有定性的描述性设计。总共采访了来自8家医院和15个科室的25名经理,分别接受了不同的外科专业(骨科,普通外科和小儿外科)和手术室套件。结果:组织结构被定义为实施的主要障碍。具体来说,来自不同部门,组织级别和专业团队的经理之间缺乏共同的合作平台,阻碍了共同目标和方向的一致。在实施成功的情况下,来自不同专业和级别的经理之间的良好运作和相互支持的关系以及对实施过程的强烈主人翁意识和控制力至关重要。尽管管理人员表示坚信安全是高层管理人员支持的重要问题,但通常目标是“尽可能地”完成尽可能多的操作。这在优先执行安全措施或生产目标之间造成了冲突,有时会导致做出与循证实践(EBP)相违背的决策。虽然证据被认为在所有实施工作中都是至关重要的,但如果挑战专业小组之间的等级界限,或者涉及预防性创新而不是技术性创新,则可能会被忽略和不信任。结论:在OR中实施EBP的前提不理想;因此,解决领导,组织和专业间的障碍至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号