...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Sport and Exercise >Laboratory-based tests for swimmers: Methodology, reliability, considerations and relationship with front-crawl performance
【24h】

Laboratory-based tests for swimmers: Methodology, reliability, considerations and relationship with front-crawl performance

机译:基于实验室的游泳选手测试:方法,可靠性,注意事项以及与前爬网性能的关系

获取原文
           

摘要

Monitoring training process in swimming is essential for providing valuable information for both coaches and athletes. Among a large variety of laboratory-based tests used for the quantification of swimmers abilities and evaluation of fitness status, the most representative and easy to apply ones are chosen to be presented in this review. Furthermore, these tests reliability, methodology, referred considerations and relationship with front-crawl swimming performance are reported. Based on the previous mentioned criteria, the assessment of aerobic, anaerobic power and muscular strength, are analyzed. From the data examined, it is concluded that despite their reliability and efficacy in determining adaptations after a training period, as well as, detecting differences between athletes’ training status, laboratory-based tests assessing aerobic, anaerobic power and muscular strength for swimmers does not meet the criterion of specificity and disregard the crucial role of technique. Normal 0 false false false EL X-NONE X-NONE.
机译:监视游泳训练过程对于为教练和运动员提供有价值的信息至关重要。在用于量化游泳者能力和评估体能状态的各种基于实验室的测试中,本次综述中选择了最具代表性和易于应用的测试。此外,还报告了这些测试的可靠性,方法学,参考注意事项以及与前爬泳性能的关系。基于前面提到的标准,对有氧,无氧力量和肌肉力量的评估进行了分析。从检查的数据可以得出结论,尽管在训练后确定适应性的可靠性和有效性以及检测运动员训练状态之间的差异,基于实验室的评估游泳者有氧,无氧力量和肌肉力量的测试并没有符合特异性标准而无视技术的关键作用。正常0否否否EL X-NONE X-NONE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号