...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Governance and Regulation >VOLATILITY EXPLOSIONS AND PRICE PREDICTION: CASE OF OIL MARKET
【24h】

VOLATILITY EXPLOSIONS AND PRICE PREDICTION: CASE OF OIL MARKET

机译:波动性爆炸和价格预测:以石油市场为例

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper explores behavior of oil market after volatility explosions (days with abnormally high price volatility). It examines possible price patterns and whether they create exploitable profit opportunities from trading. A number of statistical tests both parametrical (t-test, ANOVA, regression analysis with dummy variables) and non-parametrical (Mann–Whitney U test) confirm presence of price patterns after volatility explosions: the next day price changes in both directions are bigger than after “normal” days. Oil prices (case of Brent) for the period from January 2000 till the end of 2016 (for the trading robot analysis the period is 2014-2016) are analyzed in this paper. To incorporate transactional costs in results a trading robot approach is used. Testing of two trading strategies based on detected anomalies shows that a strategy based on counter-movements after volatility explosions produces profits and the one based on so called “inertia anomaly” does not generate profits in oil market. An important result of this paper is that presence of statistical anomaly does not necessarily means anomaly in price behavior and inconsistency with the Efficient Market Hypothesis.
机译:本文探讨了在波动性爆炸之后(价格波动异常高的日子)石油市场的行为。它检查可能的价格模式,以及它们是否通过交易创造可利用的利润机会。参数(t检验,ANOVA,带有虚拟变量的回归分析)和非参数(Mann–Whitney U检验)的大量统计检验都证实了波动性爆炸后价格模式的存在:第二天,两个方向的价格变化都更大比“正常”的日子过后。本文分析了2000年1月至2016年底期间的油价(以布伦特原油为例)(对于交易机器人分析期间为2014-2016年)。为了将交易成本纳入结果,使用了交易机器人方法。对基于检测到的异常的两种交易策略的测试表明,一种基于波动爆炸后的反向运动的策略可产生利润,而基于所谓的“惯性异常”的策略则不会在石油市场上产生利润。本文的重要结果是,统计异常的存在并不一定意味着价格行为异常以及与有效市场假说的不一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号