...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Geology & Geophysics >Comparison of Magnetic Basement Depth Values from Spectral Technique, SPITH and Slope Techniques using HRAM
【24h】

Comparison of Magnetic Basement Depth Values from Spectral Technique, SPITH and Slope Techniques using HRAM

机译:使用HRAM的光谱技术,SPITH和坡度技术的磁性基底深度值的比较

获取原文

摘要

The quantitative results obtained from the use of spectral analysis technique, Source parameter Imaging technique and empirical depth rule method (maximum and half slope techniques) in interpreting High Resolution AeroMagnetic of middle Benue trough data have been presented and compared. Before employing each technique, the regional residual seperation was done with least square method using polifit program to get the residual data for onward processing. The slope technique usually require that the residual values be contoured into map and then profiled along the most prominent anomaly to obtain the depth curves from where depth to magnetic sources could be calculated. The Spectral requires that the residual values be sub-divided into spectral blocks and radial energy spectrum be generated from where depth would be calculated from the slopes of the straight line plots. The SPI requires the griding of the residual values and the conversion of this to image map from where depth could be read off easily. The deep magnetic anomally source gotten ranges from 2.00 km to 6.29 km with an average depth of 3.25 km for SPI technique; 2.33 km to less than 5.66 km with an average depth of 3.65 km for Spectral analysis technique; and average of 3.74 km and 3.66 km for Half-slope and maximum slope technique respectively. These average depth could be taken as the magnetic basement depth and has the significant that if other conditions are met, this study area of marine sedimentary layer of the Albian Age is favourable for hydrocation accumulation. The shallow source depth gotten ranges from 0.02 km to 2.00 km with an average depth of 1.08 km for SPI; 0.05 km to less than 0.42 km with an average depth of 0.21 km for spectral analysis; and an average depth 0.80 km for Half slope technique. This can be viewed as magmatic intrussion into the sediment and could be responsible for the lead-Zinc mineralization found in the area. These methods thus compares favourably well and moreso the slope technique though empirical has compared favourably with more modern automatic source depth methods.
机译:提出并比较了使用光谱分析技术,源参数成像技术和经验深度规则方法(最大和半斜率技术)解释中贝努河谷高分辨率数据的定量结果。在使用每种技术之前,使用polifit程序以最小二乘法进行区域残差分离,以获取残差数据以进行后续处理。斜率技术通常需要将残差值绘制成轮廓图,然后沿着最突出的异常进行剖析,以获取可从中计算出到磁源深度的深度曲线。频谱要求将残差值细分为频谱块,并从可从直线图的斜率计算深度的位置生成径向能谱。 SPI要求对残差值进行网格化,并将其转换为可以轻松读取深度的图像图。 SPI技术获得的深磁异常源范围从2.00 km到6.29 km,平均深度为3.25 km; 2.33 km至小于5.66 km,光谱分析技术的平均深度为3.65 km;半坡技术和最大坡度技术的平均值分别为3.74公里和3.66公里。这些平均深度可以作为磁性基底的深度,并且具有重要的意义,如果满足其他条件,该研究区的阿尔比纪海相沉积层将有利于水合作用的积累。浅源深度为0.02 km至2.00 km,SPI的平均深度为1.08 km。 0.05 km至小于0.42 km,光谱分析的平均深度为0.21 km;半坡技术的平均深度为0.80 km。这可以看作是岩浆侵入岩浆,可能是该地区发现的铅锌矿化的原因。这些方法因此可以很好地进行比较,尽管经验上也可以将坡度技术与更现代的自动源深度方法进行比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号