首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Global Economics >Saving Cyprus from its “Financial Crisis” in 2013 by the Troika: A Necessary Action Under the Right Terms and Conditions?
【24h】

Saving Cyprus from its “Financial Crisis” in 2013 by the Troika: A Necessary Action Under the Right Terms and Conditions?

机译:三驾马车让塞浦路斯从2013年的“金融危机”中拯救出来:在正确的条款和条件下采取必要的行动?

获取原文
       

摘要

At June 25th 2012 Cyprus asked the Troika for financial aid after the two biggest banks of the small island state got into distress due to the contagion of the financial crisis from Greece. There were losses piled up of around 4 Bn. Euro. Through interlinkages between the public sector and the banking sector and an ever-intensifying financial crisis in the Eurozone, Cyprus was in jeopardy of losing the capability of repaying its debts. Since then among the EU-members (in politics as well as in society) the question of a bail-out necessity for distressed countries, particularly Greece and Cyprus were discussed. This paper discusses pros and cons of an imminent rescue-package in for Cyprus in terms of necessities as well as specifically a combined bail-out bail-in mechanism. The findings suggest, that both, generally and specifically regarding the Cypriot case, bail-ins have shown to be effective in reducing the financing needs for respective governments and creditors. Nevertheless, such measures do not come without a price. Therefore, political, social and cultural aspects and impacts on the citizens are regarded in this work.
机译:在小岛国的两家最大银行因希腊爆发金融危机而陷入困境之后,2012年6月25日,塞浦路斯要求三驾马车提供财务援助。累计亏损约40亿美元。欧元。通过公共部门与银行部门之间的相互联系以及欧元区不断加剧的金融危机,塞浦路斯面临丧失偿还债务能力的危险。从那以后,在欧盟成员国中(无论在政治上还是在社会上)都讨论了困境国家,特别是希腊和塞浦路斯的纾困必要性问题。本文讨论了迫在眉睫的塞浦路斯救助方案的必要性和利弊,特别是结合了救助方案。调查结果表明,就塞浦路斯案件而言,一般而言,特别是就保释而言,保释金均能有效减少各自政府和债权人的融资需求。然而,这些措施并非没有代价。因此,这项工作考虑了政治,社会和文化方面以及对公民的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号