首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environment and Ecology >Evaluation of AVI and DRASTIC Methods for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping
【24h】

Evaluation of AVI and DRASTIC Methods for Groundwater Vulnerability Mapping

机译:AVI和DRASTIC方法在地下水脆弱性制图中的评价

获取原文
           

摘要

The Densu River Basin is one of the important basins in Ghana. A large number of residents in this basin are dependent on groundwater for their livelihood. However, with the growing population, urbanization and impact of climate change, it is imperative to develop ways to protect and manage the limited groundwater resource that is supporting the communities. As a result, this paper assessed the groundwater vulnerability by comparing two methods – the Depth to water, net Recharge, Aquifer media, Soil media, Topography, Impact of the vadose zone, and hydraulic Conductivity DRASTIC an the Aquifer Vulnerability Index (AVI). The results show that DRASTIC is more precise and representative of the groundwater vulnerability in the basin. The AVI statistically show a relatively lower risks compared to DRASTIC. It is recommended, AVI which is oversimplified may be useful for larger basins.
机译:丹苏流域是加纳的重要流域之一。该流域的许多居民赖以为生。但是,随着人口的增长,城市化和气候变化的影响,必须开发保护和管理支持社区的有限地下水资源的方法。结果,本文通过比较两种方法(水深,净补给,含水层介质,土壤介质,地形,渗流区的影响以及水力传导率DRASTIC和含水层脆弱性指数(AVI))来评估地下水的脆弱性。结果表明,DRASTIC更为精确,可以代表流域的地下水脆弱性。与DRASTIC相比,AVI统计上显示出相对较低的风险。建议过分简化的AVI对较大的流域很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号