首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environment and Ecology >Comparisons of Line Transect and Point Count Survey Methods by Estimating Density of Grey Squirrel Sciurus Carolinensis
【24h】

Comparisons of Line Transect and Point Count Survey Methods by Estimating Density of Grey Squirrel Sciurus Carolinensis

机译:估算灰松鼠松鼠密度的线样线和点数测量方法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

The methods have used to study animal population must be defined clearly at the beginning of the project. We compared line transect and point count survey methods to estimating the density of grey squirrel at University of East Anglia campus (UEA), Norwich-United Kingdom. Across the entire UEA campus we surveyed 0.43698 ha of the 146 ha of the campus area. A total of 21 squirrels were observed during survey between 21st-26th in December 2013. Nine individuals were observed during line transect and twelve individuals were observed during point counts. The average number of species detected was differing between the two methods. Density estimates of grey squirrel from the two methods were different. Densities of grey squirrel as estimated by point count surveys were higher than those by line transect count surveys. Our results indicate that it is important to account for different survey methods when comparing the two methods to estimate the grey squirrel.
机译:在项目开始时必须明确定义用于研究动物种群的方法。我们比较了线样点和点数调查方法,以估计英国诺里奇东英吉利大学校园(UEA)的灰松鼠密度。在整个UEA校园中,我们调查了146公顷校园面积中的0.43698公顷。在2013年12月的第21sup-26supup期间,总共观察到21只松鼠。在线样期间观察到9个人,在点计数期间观察到12个人。两种方法之间检测到的平均物种数不同。两种方法对灰松鼠的密度估计不同。通过点计数调查估计的灰松鼠密度高于通过线样计数调查的灰鼠密度。我们的结果表明,在比较两种方法以估计灰松鼠时考虑不同的调查方法很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号