首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Eurasian Studies >Islamic radicalism that never was Islamic discourse as an extension of the elite’s quest for legitimation. Azerbaijan in focus
【24h】

Islamic radicalism that never was Islamic discourse as an extension of the elite’s quest for legitimation. Azerbaijan in focus

机译:伊斯兰激进主义从来不是伊斯兰话语,而是精英对合法性的追求的延伸。阿塞拜疆成为焦点

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Not unlike the global dynamics and the developments in the rest of Central Eurasia, Islamic discourse in Azerbaijan over the past two decades has not reflected the micro-level shifts in the country’s social-cultural landscape. Rather, it has been formed and evolved as a collateral product of the elite’s tactical pursuit of legitimation across domestic and international planes of power. Grounded in its quest for tactical and strategic survival, the elite’s pursuit of Western (and broader international) recognition, in particular, has stood at the core of the elite’s policies toward Islam and molded the confines of state-promoted Islamic discourse. The regime’s overall strategy has been to continuously reinforce the representation of Islam as an imminent danger to the stability and secular nature of Azerbaijani statehood, while positioning itself—in the eyes of both the “liberal,” “democratic” West and the secularized population at home—as the sole force capable of staving off the Islamic threat. At that, the narrative of Islamic radicalism in Azerbaijan has centered around three principal dynamics: the regime’s anti-hijab policies, the regime’s policies toward the settlement of Nardaran in Baku’s suburbs, and the activities of the Islamic Party of Azerbaijan (IPA). This article provides a closer look at all three to expose the elite’s intention of using these as their primary trigger mechanisms and reference points in the quest for Western—and secular domestic—legitimation and, as such, the pursuit of the negative representation of Islam as a threat to secularity and modern statehood.
机译:与全球动态和中亚欧亚其他地区的发展一样,过去二十年来在阿塞拜疆的伊斯兰言论并未反映出该国社会文化格局的微观变化。相反,它是作为精英在国内外力量层面对合法性进行战术追求的附带产品而形成和发展的。出于对战术和战略生存的追求,精英们对西方(以及更广泛的国际)承认的追求,尤其是精英们对伊斯兰教政策的核心,并塑造了国家倡导的伊斯兰话语的界限。该政权的总体战略一直是不断加强对伊斯兰的代表,这是对阿塞拜疆国家稳定和世俗性质的迫在眉睫的威胁,同时将自己置于“自由主义”,“民主”西方和世俗化世俗人群的眼中。家-这是能够抵御伊斯兰威胁的唯一力量。那时,阿塞拜疆伊斯兰激进主义的叙事围绕三个主要动力:该政权的反希贾布政策,该政权对巴库郊区纳达尔达人定居的政策以及阿塞拜疆伊斯兰党(IPA)的活动。本文对这三个方面进行了仔细研究,以揭示精英们在寻求西方和世俗国内合法化以及追求伊斯兰的负面代表作为主要触发机制和参考点时的意图。对世俗和现代国家地位的威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号