...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Health Promotion >Community-based interventions for health promotion and disease prevention in noncommunicable diseases: A narrative review
【24h】

Community-based interventions for health promotion and disease prevention in noncommunicable diseases: A narrative review

机译:基于社区的非传染性疾病促进健康和疾病预防干预措施:叙事回顾

获取原文

摘要

PURPOSE: Noncommunicable disease (NCD) prevention is emerging as a public health priority in developing countries. For better health outcome in these countries, it is necessary to understand the different community-based interventions developed and implemented across the world. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the current review is to identify the best strategies used in community-based health intervention (CBHI) programs across the world. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For review, we searched in PubMed and Google Scholar with the keywords “community based,” “health interventions,” “health promotions,” “primary prevention,” chronic diseases,” “lifestyle-related diseases,” and “NCD.” Data were extracted using predesigned data extraction form. CBHI studies detailing their intervention strategies only were included in the review. RESULTS: Out of 35 articles reviewed, 14 (40%) were randomized control trials, while 18 (51.4%) were quasi-experimental design. Individual level ( n = 14), group level ( n = 5), community level ( n = 6), and policy level ( n = 4) intervention strategies were identified. Twenty-three (64%) studies were based on interventions for 1 year and above. Twenty-eight (80%) studies were intervened among specific populations such as Latinos and so on. CONCLUSION: Successful programs advocate for a package or a chain of interventions than a single intervention. The type of interventions at different levels, namely individual, group, community, and policy levels vary across studies, but individual, and group level interventions are more frequently used.
机译:目的:非传染性疾病(NCD)的预防正在成为发展中国家的公共卫生重点。为了使这些国家的健康状况更好,有必要了解世界各地开发和实施的各种基于社区的干预措施。目的:本次审查的目的是确定全世界基于社区的健康干预(CBHI)计划中使用的最佳策略。材料和方法:为了进行审查,我们在PubMed和Google Scholar中搜索了“基于社区”,“健康干预”,“健康促进”,“初级预防”,“慢性病”,“与生活方式有关的疾病”和“ NCD。”使用预先设计的数据提取表提取数据。 CBHI研究仅详细介绍了其干预策略,该评价也包括在内。结果:在所审查的35篇文章中,有14篇(40%)是随机对照试验,而18篇(51.4%)是准实验设计。确定了个人级别(n = 14),小组级别(n = 5),社区级别(n = 6)和政策级别(n = 4)干预策略。 23项研究(64%)基于1年及以上的干预措施。二十八(80%)项研究是在特定人群中进行的,例如拉丁美洲人等。结论:成功的计划提倡一揽子或一系列干预措施,而不是单一干预措施。在各个研究中,不同级别的干预类型(即个人,团体,社区和政策级别)各不相同,但是个人和团体级别的干预更为常用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号