...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development >The Effectiveness of Aid and their Fiscal Response in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence
【24h】

The Effectiveness of Aid and their Fiscal Response in Sub-Saharan Africa: Theoretical and Empirical Evidence

机译:撒哈拉以南非洲地区援助的有效性及其财政响应:理论和经验证据

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study primary target is to examine the effects of aid on fiscal responses in Sub-Saharan Africa. The significant of capital accumulation for economic development and growth was broadly recognized long time ago. However, most developing nations- particularly Sub-Saharan African nations, are still trapped in ‘vicious circle of poverty’ and have failed to fund most of the desired level of investment from their own domestic savings. Previous studies of development debated that these nations would come out of stagnation only if they received support from developed countries (Rodan 1961, and Chenery and Strout 1966). Based on this observation donors from developed countries are concerned about how their aid is been used in various recipient countries, especially how it affects the fiscal responses by the receiving countries government. Aid may be given to governments; but the effectiveness will hinge on their fiscal behavior from diverse recipient government. The preponderance evidence from theoretical and empirical literature on the effectiveness of aid proposes that external finance has not had a remarkable influence on development in most Sub-Saharan Africa nations. However, there are certain evidences that aid has had certain major impacts on growth in most favorable policy environments. This survey reviews the current proof on the effects of external finance on government tax and expenditure effort in diverse receiving nations-especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, ending with a discussion of when budget support is a fiscally effective aid modality. Severe data shortcomings restrict inferences on the association between expenditure and aid, particular as most regimes are not aware of all the available aid to fund the provision of public goods. Three generalities are allowed by the proof: aid fund government expenditure; the degree to which external finance is fungible is over-stated and even where it is fungible this does not seem to make the external finance less effective; and there is no systematic effect of aid on tax effort. Beyond these conclusions the fiscal effect of external finance are nation-specific. Keywords: Aid, Fiscal response, fungibility, Government expenditure, taxation
机译:这项研究的主要目标是研究撒哈拉以南非洲地区援助对财政反应的影响。长期以来,资本积累对于经济发展和增长的巨大意义已得到广泛认可。但是,大多数发展中国家,尤其是撒哈拉以南非洲国家,仍然陷于“贫困的恶性循环”中,未能从自己的国内储蓄中为大部分期望的投资水平提供资金。以前的发展研究认为,只有得到发达国家的支持,这些国家才会摆脱停滞状态(Rodan 1961,Chenery and Strout 1966)。基于这一观察结果,来自发达国家的捐助者担心其援助如何在各个受援国中使用,特别是其如何影响受援国政府的财政对策。可以向政府提供援助;但其有效性将取决于接受国政府的财政行为。来自理论和经验文献的关于援助有效性的大量证据表明,在大多数撒哈拉以南非洲国家中,外部金融对发展没有产生显着影响。但是,有某些证据表明,在最有利的政策环境中,援助对经济增长产生了某些重大影响。这项调查回顾了有关外部接收国(尤其是撒哈拉以南非洲地区)外部金融对政府税收和支出努力的影响的当前证据,最后讨论了何时预算支持是一种财政有效的援助方式。严重的数据缺陷限制了对支出与援助之间联系的推论,特别是因为大多数政权并不了解为公共物品提供资金的所有可用援助。证明允许三个一般性:援助资金政府支出;对外融资的可替代程度被夸大了,即使在可替代的情况下,这似乎也不会使对外融资的有效性降低;援助对税收工作没有系统性的影响。除了这些结论外,外部融资的财政效应是针对特定国家的。关键字:援助,财政应对,可替代性,政府支出,税收

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号