首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Education and Practice >Traditional Instruction Versus Virtual Reality Simulation: A Comparative Study of Phlebotomy Training among Nursing Students in Kuwait
【24h】

Traditional Instruction Versus Virtual Reality Simulation: A Comparative Study of Phlebotomy Training among Nursing Students in Kuwait

机译:传统教学与虚拟现实模拟:科威特护理学生静脉放血训练的比较研究

获取原文
       

摘要

This quasi-experimental study compared differences in phlebotomy performance on a live client, between a control group taught through the traditional method and an experimental group using virtual reality simulation. The study showed both groups had performed successfully, using the following metrics: number of reinsertions, pain factor, hematoma status, duration of tourniquet application, time to complete the procedure, and successful completion of procedure. Utilizing t-test in comparing the control and experimental groups, no performance metric was found to be significant. Total time to complete the procedure for both groups had the lowest p value, but was of no significance. Both methods for phlebotomy training were found to be equally effective. Nurse educators are challenged to recognize the advantages and limitations of both methods to pave their way in an enhanced quality phlebotomy program.
机译:这项准实验研究比较了通过传统方法授课的对照组和使用虚拟现实仿真的实验组之间在实时客户中进行放血的性能差异。研究表明,两组均使用以下指标成功完成了手术:重新插入次数,疼痛因子,血肿状态,止血带应用时间,完成手术的时间以及手术成功完成。利用t检验比较对照组和实验组,没有发现显着的性能指标。两组完成该过程的总时间的p值最低,但没有意义。两种放血训练方法被认为是同样有效的。护士教育工作者面临挑战,要认识到这两种方法的优点和局限性,以便为质量更高的放血计划铺平道路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号