首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy >Comparison of iso-effective and cost-effective high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment schedules in cervical cancer – regional cancer center experience
【24h】

Comparison of iso-effective and cost-effective high-dose-rate brachytherapy treatment schedules in cervical cancer – regional cancer center experience

机译:比较宫颈癌的等剂量和成本效益高剂量近距离放射治疗方案–区域癌症中心的经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose The study is to evaluate the difference between outcomes of two high-dose-rate fractionation schedules in the treatment of intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) of cervical cancer. Material and methods A retrospective analysis of 163 cervical cancer patients was completed. All patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to whole pelvis with concurrent weekly chemotherapy, followed by ICBT with either 7 Gy per fraction in three fractions (arm A) or 9 Gy per fraction in two fractions (arm B). Median follow-up was 19 months. The outcomes were compared in terms of 2-year actuarial local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and late toxicity in the two treatment arms. Results The 2-year actuarial local control rates in arm A and arm B were 88.5% and 91.5%, respectively. The actuarial 2-year disease-free survival rates in arm A and arm B were 85.9% and 82.6%, respectively. The actuarial 2-year overall survival in arm A and arm B were 95.7% and 100%, respectively (p = 0.06). There were 12.7% and 15.2% local failures in arm A and arm B, respectively. Distant metastases were seen in 8.5% and 7.6% in arm A and arm B, respectively. The 2-year actuarial risk of developing late rectal toxicity in arm A and arm B were 5.6% and 5.4%, respectively. The 2-year actuarial risk of developing late bladder toxicity in arm A and arm B were 2.8% and 2.2%, respectively. Conclusions ICBT treatment with 9 Gy in two fractions offers equivocal local control rates and survival rates in cancer cervix cases with many advantages of short overall treatment time, improved patient compliance, cost effectiveness, and reduced exposure to aesthetic agents. The toxicities observed were few, low grade, and easily manageable.
机译:目的本研究旨在评估两种高剂量率分次方案在宫颈癌腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)中的疗效之间的差异。材料和方法回顾性分析了163例宫颈癌患者。所有患者均接受整骨盆的外部束放射疗法(EBRT)并同时进行每周一次化学疗法,然后进行ICBT,三部分中每部分7 Gy(A组)或两部分中每部分9 Gy(B B)。中位随访时间为19个月。比较了两个治疗组的2年精算局部控制,无病生存期,总体生存期和晚期毒性等方面的结局。结果A组和B组的2年精算局部控制率分别为88.5%和91.5%。 A组和B组的2年无病精算生存率分别为85.9%和82.6%。 A组和B组的2年精算总生存率分别为95.7%和100%(p = 0.06)。 A组和B组的局部故障分别为12.7%和15.2%。 A组和B组分别有8.5%和7.6%的远处转移。 A组和B组发生直肠后期毒性的2年精算风险分别为5.6%和5.4%。 A组和B组发生膀胱晚期毒性的2年精算风险分别为2.8%和2.2%。结论分为两部分的9 Gy的ICBT治疗在宫颈癌病例中提供了模棱两可的局部控制率和存活率,并具有整体治疗时间短,患者依从性提高,成本效益高以及减少接触美容剂的许多优点。所观察到的毒性很小,等级低并且易于控制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号