首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy >A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region
【24h】

A dosimetric study of electron beam therapy vs. high-dose-rate mould brachytherapy in adjuvant treatment of non-melanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck region

机译:电子束疗法与高剂量霉菌近距离放射疗法在头颈部非黑素瘤皮肤癌辅助治疗中的剂量学研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose Radiation for superficial tumours of the head and neck region can be given either by brachytherapy or electrons. Brachytherapy (BT), due to rapid dose fall-off and minor set-up errors, should be superior to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for treatment of lesions in difficult locations such as the nose and earlobe. The present study is a dosimetric comparison of computed tomography (CT)-based mould brachytherapy treatment plans with 3D conformal electron beam therapy in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC). Material and methods From December 2017 to November 2018 10 patients with NMSC of the head and neck region (forehead, nose, cheek) who underwent adjuvant radiation with HDR brachytherapy (BT) with a surface mould individual applicator were enrolled for analysis. We evaluated dose coverage by minimal dose to 90% of planning target volume (PTV, DSUB90/SUB), volumes of PTV receiving 90-150% of prescribed dose (PD) (VPTVSUB90-150/SUB), conformal index for 90% and 100% of PD (COINSUB90/SUB, COINSUB100/SUB), dose homogeneity index (DHI), dose nonuniformity ratio (DNR), and exposure of organs at risk (OARs) (eyes, lens, underlying bone and skin). Prospectively, we created CT-based treatment plans for electron beam therapy. We compared conformity (COINSUB90/SUB, COINSUB100/SUB), dose coverage of PTV (DSUB90/SUB, VPTVSUB90/SUB, VPTVSUB100/SUB), volumes of body receiving 10-90% of PD (VSUB10/SUB-VSUB90/SUB), doses to OARs (Dsub0.1cc/sub and Dsub2cc/sub) of BT and electron plans. Results We obtained mean BT-DHI 0.81, BT-DNR 0.608, Electron-DHI 1.25. We observed no significant differences in VPTVSUB90/SUB,sub100/sub and DSUB90/SUB between BT and electron beam. Mean BT-VPTVsub125/sub,sub150/sub were significantly higher than Electron-VPTVSUB100/SUB,sub125/sub. COINSUB90/SUB was superior for BT plans. Conclusions CT-based surface mould brachytherapy results in better conformity of superficial lesions on small, irregular surfaces such as the nose and inner canthus than electrons with a slightly higher skin dose.
机译:目的可以通过近距离放射疗法或电子方式对头颈部区域的浅表肿瘤进行放射。由于剂量快速下降和设置错误较小,近距离放射治疗(BT)应当优于外部束放射疗法(EBRT),用于治疗鼻子和耳垂等困难部位的病变。本研究是基于计算机断层扫描(CT)的霉菌近距离放射治疗计划与3D保形电子束治疗在非黑素瘤皮肤癌(NMSC)治疗中的剂量学比较。材料和方法自2017年12月至2018年11月,对10例头颈区域(前额,鼻子,脸颊)的NMSC患者进行了HDR近距离放射治疗(BT),并使用表面霉菌单独涂药器进行辅助放射治疗。我们通过最小剂量评估计划覆盖率(PTV,D 90 )的90%,接受90-150%处方剂量(PD)的PTV(VPTV 90-150)的剂量覆盖率),PD的90%和100%的保形指数(COIN 90 ,COIN 100 ),剂量均匀性指数(DHI),剂量不均匀率(DNR) ),以及处于危险中的器官(OAR)(眼睛,晶状体,下面的骨骼和皮肤)的暴露。潜在地,我们创建了基于CT的电子束治疗计划。我们比较了合格性(COIN 90 ,COIN 100 ),PTV的剂量覆盖率(D 90 ,VPTV 90 , VPTV 100 ),接受10-90%PD(V 10 -V 90 )的人体体积,对OAR剂量(D 0.1cc 和D 2cc )。结果我们获得平均BT-DHI 0.81,BT-DNR 0.608,Electron-DHI 1.25。我们发现BT和电子束在VPTV 90 100 和D 90 之间没有显着差异。 BT-VPTV 125 150 的平均值显着高于Electron-VPTV 100 125 。对于BT计划,COIN 90 更为出色。结论基于CT的表面霉菌近距离放射治疗比在皮肤剂量稍高的电子能在较小的不规则表面(如鼻子和内can)上更好地整合浅表病变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号