首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care >Partial replacement of board-certified specialist-grade physicians with emergency medicine trainees in a busy Emergency Department: Lack of adverse effect on time to physician
【24h】

Partial replacement of board-certified specialist-grade physicians with emergency medicine trainees in a busy Emergency Department: Lack of adverse effect on time to physician

机译:在繁忙的急诊科中,由急诊医学见习医师部分替代获得董事会认证的专家级医师:消除对医生时间的不利影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives: Standard Emergency Department (ED) operations goals include minimization of the time interval between patients' initial ED presentation and initial emergency physician (EP) evaluation. Following up on previous work defining factors influencing the “time to physician” (tMD) in a busy ED, the current study was undertaken to evaluate whether tMD was adversely impacted by the ED's partial replacement of specialist-grade EPs with Emergency Medicine (EM) trainees (at the resident and fellow level). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted using four months (September through December 2015) of an ED administrative database (EDAD), in an urban academic tertiary ED with an annual census of approximately 500,000; during the four study months the ED census was 165,969. To minimize confounding by time of day and related factors, data analysis focused solely on the “day shift” (0600-1400) of each of the study period's 122 days. EDAD data were combined with EP rostering data to generate a multivariate linear regression model that assessed the dependent variable tMD, for significant changes associated with increasing proportion – not necessarily always the same as increasing absolute number of trainees (i.e. summed residents and fellows as a total percent of all on-duty EPs). There were trainees in the ED throughout the study, but the trainee numbers as a proportion of the overall physician staffing fluctuated, thus providing a basis for analysis. The model adjusted for covariates previously demonstrated to impact tMD at the study center. Analyses were conducted with Stata 14MP, with significance defined at p?
机译:目标:标准急诊科(ED)的操作目标包括最小化患者初次ED表现与初次急诊医师(EP)评估之间的时间间隔。在确定影响繁忙的急诊室“医师时间”(tMD)的因素之前的工作之后,本研究旨在评估急诊室(EM)用专业医学部分替换急诊科医师是否会对tMD产生不利影响受训人员(居民和同伴级)。方法:这项回顾性研究是在一个城市学术专科ED中使用ED行政数据库(EDAD)四个月(从2015年9月至2015年12月)进行的,每年的人口普查约为500,000次。在四个研究月中,ED普查为165,969。为了最大程度地减少一天中的时间和相关因素的混淆,数据分析仅集中在研究时段的122天中的“日班”(0600-1400)。 EDAD数据与EP排班数据相结合,以生成评估因变量tMD的多元线性回归模型,以进行与比例增加相关的重大变化-不一定总是与受训人员的绝对数量增加相同(即,总的居民和同乡总数所有值班EP的百分比)。在整个研究过程中,急诊室都有受训人员,但受训人员人数占总医生人数的比例波动,因此为分析提供了基础。先前针对协变量进行调整的模型在研究中心对tMD产生了影响。用Stata 14MP进行分析,其显着性定义为p≤0.05,置信区间为95%。结果:在一个可接受的回归模型中,该模型针对影响tMD的多个参数进行了调整,引入的协变量代表值勤实习医生的比例非常小(β估计值为0.07,95%置信区间0.16至0.30),并且没有统计学意义显着(p≤0.53)。结论:在对影响tMD的变量进行的多元分析中,没有迹象表明由EM学员在经过适当培训的老师的充分监督下部分替换董事会认证的专家级EP会对tMD产生不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号