首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Dentistry >Effect of Different Instrumentation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth
【24h】

Effect of Different Instrumentation Techniques on Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth

机译:不同仪器技术对牙本质治疗牙齿垂直根骨折抵抗力的影响

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Statement of the Problem: Vertical root fractures are catastrophic events that often result in tooth extraction. Many contributing factor are associated with increasing incidence of vertical root fracture. Root canal preparation is one of the predisposing factors which can increase the root susceptibility to vertical fracture. Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different instrumentation techniques on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Materials and Methods: In this study, 120 freshly extracted mandibular premolar teeth of similar dimensions were decoronated and randomly divided into control (n=30), nickel-titanium hand K-file (HF, n=30), BioRaCe rotary file (BR, n=30), and WaveOne reciprocating single-file (WO, n=30) groups. After cleaning and shaping the root canals, AH26 was used as canal sealer, and obturation was completed using the continuous wave technique. The root canals were embedded vertically in standardised autopolymerising acrylic resin blocks, and subjected to a vertical load to cause vertical root fracture. The forces required to induce fractures were measured using a universal testing machine. ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test were used to analyse the data. Results: All experimental groups showed statistically significant reductions in fracture resistance as compared with the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the HF and BR groups. The WO group did not differ significantly from the HF group or the BR group. Conclusion: All three instrumentation techniques caused weakening of the structure of the roots, and rendered them susceptible to fracture under lesser load than unprepared roots. The fracture resistance of roots prepared with the single-file reciprocating technique was similar to that of those prepared with NiTi hand and rotary instrumentation techniques.
机译:问题陈述:垂直的根部骨折是灾难性事件,通常导致拔牙。许多因素与垂直牙根骨折的发生率增加有关。根管准备是增加根对垂直骨折敏感性的诱因之一。目的:本研究的目的是比较三种不同的器械技术对牙髓治疗牙齿垂直牙根骨折抵抗的影响。材料与方法:在这项研究中,对120颗新近拔出的类似尺寸的下颌前磨牙进行了装饰,并随机分为对照组(n = 30),镍钛手工K型锉(HF,n = 30),BioRaCe旋转锉(BR ,n = 30)和WaveOne往复单文件(WO,n = 30)组。清洁并成形根管后,将AH26用作根管封闭剂,并使用连续波技术完成封闭。将根管垂直嵌入标准的自聚合丙烯酸树脂块中,并承受垂直载荷以引起垂直根部断裂。使用万能试验机测量引起断裂所需的力。方差分析和Tukey的事后检验用于分析数据。结果:与对照组相比,所有实验组的骨折抵抗力均有统计学意义的降低。 HF组和BR组之间存在统计学上的显着差异。 WO组与HF组或BR组无明显差异。结论:所有三种仪器技术均导致根部结构变弱,并使其比未准备的根部在较小的载荷下易于断裂。单锉往复技术制备的根的抗断裂性与NiTi手动和旋转仪器技术制备的根的抗断裂性相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号