首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs >The Downside of Indonesia’s Successful Liberal Democratisation and the Way Ahead. Notes from the Participatory Surveys and Case Studies 2000–2016
【24h】

The Downside of Indonesia’s Successful Liberal Democratisation and the Way Ahead. Notes from the Participatory Surveys and Case Studies 2000–2016

机译:印度尼西亚成功的自由民主化的弊端和未来之路。 2000–2016年参与式调查和案例研究的注释

获取原文
           

摘要

Indonesia is a critical case of liberal democratisation. Most of the country’s old dominant actors were included in compromises aimed at democracy and were expected to become democrats by adjusting to the new institutions. The pro-democrats were expected to propel change from civil society. However, the recurrent participatory surveys and follow-up studies summarised herein point to remarkable freedoms, along with deplorable governance and representation. The major causes are biased institutions of representation, plus weak political capacity of the crucial actors of change within modern business and among the middle classes and labourers. Advances presuppose new ways to represent their interests. with Hasrul Hanif, Eric Hiariej, Willy P. Samadhi and Amalin-da Savirani
机译:印度尼西亚是自由民主化的关键案例。该国大多数老的主导角色都被包括在针对民主的妥协中,并有望通过适应新机构而成为民主主义者。亲民主人士有望推动公民社会的变革。但是,本文总结的周期性参与性调查和后续研究指出了显着的自由以及令人遗憾的治理和代表权。主要原因是代表制的偏见,加上现代企业内部以及中产阶级和劳动者中变革的关键行为者的政治能力薄弱。进步预设了代表他们利益的新方法。与Hasrul Hanif,Eric Hiariej,Willy P.Samadhi和Amalin-da Savirani

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号