...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Digital Planimetry Results in More Accurate Wound Measurements: A Comparison to Standard Ruler Measurements
【24h】

Digital Planimetry Results in More Accurate Wound Measurements: A Comparison to Standard Ruler Measurements

机译:数字平面测量法可实现更精确的伤口测量:与标准尺测量的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Cutaneous wound measurements are important to track the healing of a wound and direct appropriate therapy. The most commonly used method to calculate wound area is an estimation by multiplying the longest length by the widest width. Other devices can provide an accurate and precise measurement of the true area (TA). This study aim was to compare wound areas calculated by computerized planimetry with standard area estimation by multiplying the longest length by the widest width ( l × w). Methods: We reviewed the wound records of 10 patients with circular or oval wounds and estimated the area with the l × w method. We compared this with the TA obtained by a specialized planimetric camera. Results: Average wound size was 4.3 cm~(2)by l × w estimation and 3 cm~(2)by TA calculation. We found the l × w method overestimated wound area an average of 41%. Conclusions: Standard, manual ( l × w) measurement of cutaneous wounds inaccurately overestimates wound area by roughly 40%.
机译:背景:皮肤伤口测量对于追踪伤口的愈合和指导适当的治疗很重要。计算伤口面积最常用的方法是通过将最长长度乘以最宽宽度来估算。其他设备可以提供真实面积(TA)的精确测量。这项研究的目的是通过将最长的长度乘以最宽的宽度(l×w),将通过计算机平面测量法计算的伤口面积与标准面积估算值进行比较。方法:我们回顾了10例圆形或椭圆形伤口的伤口记录,并采用l×w方法估计了面积。我们将其与通过专用平面相机获得的TA进行了比较。结果:根据l×w估计,平均伤口大小为4.3 cm〜(2),通过TA计算,平均伤口大小为3 cm〜(2)。我们发现l×w方法平均高估了创面面积41%。结论:皮肤伤口的标准,手动(l×w)测量不准确地高估了伤口面积约40%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号