...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology >Commentary on “Performance of a Glucose Meter with a Built-in Automated Bolus Calculator versus Manual Bolus Calculation in Insulin-Using Subjects”
【24h】

Commentary on “Performance of a Glucose Meter with a Built-in Automated Bolus Calculator versus Manual Bolus Calculation in Insulin-Using Subjects”

机译:关于“在使用胰岛素的受试者中使用内置的自动量计算器与手动量计算血糖仪的性能”的评论

获取原文
           

摘要

Since the early 2000s, there has been an exponentially increasing development of new diabetes-applied technology such as continuous glucose monitoring, bolus calculators, and “smart” pumps, with the expectation of partially overcoming clinical inertia and low patient compliance. However, its long-term efficacy in glucose control has not been unequivocally proven. In this issue of Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology , Sussman and colleagues evaluated a tool for the calculation of the prandial insulin dose. A total of 205 insulin-treated patients were asked to compute a bolus dose in two simulated conditions either manually or with the bolus calculator built into the FreeStyle InsuLinx meter, revealing the high frequency of wrong calculations when performed manually. Although the clinical impact of this study is limited, it highlights the potential implications of low diabetes-related numeracy in poor glycemic control. Educational programs aiming to increase patients' empowerment and caregivers' knowledge are needed in order to get full benefit of the technology.
机译:自2000年代初以来,新的糖尿病应用技术(例如连续血糖监测,推注计算器和“智能”泵)的发展呈指数级增长,并有望部分克服临床惯性和低患者依从性。但是,其在血糖控制中的长期功效尚未得到明确证明。在本期《糖尿病科学与技术杂志》中,Sussman及其同事评估了一种用于计算餐时胰岛素剂量的工具。总共205名接受胰岛素治疗的患者被要求在两种模拟条件下手动计算剂量或使用FreeStyle InsuLinx仪表内置的剂量计算器计算剂量,这揭示了手动执行错误计算的高频率。尽管这项研究的临床影响是有限的,但它突出显示了糖尿病相关的低血糖控制对血糖控制不良的潜在影响。为了充分利用该技术,需要旨在提高患者能力和护理人员知识的教育计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号