首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >Manual versus automated streaking system in clinical microbiology laboratory: Performance evaluation of Previ Isola for blood culture and body fluid samples
【24h】

Manual versus automated streaking system in clinical microbiology laboratory: Performance evaluation of Previ Isola for blood culture and body fluid samples

机译:临床微生物实验室中的手动与自动划线系统:Previ Isola在血液培养和体液样本中的性能评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The process of plate streaking has been automated to improve routine workflow of clinical microbiology laboratories. Although there were many evaluation reports about the inoculation of various body fluid samples, few evaluations have been reported for blood. In this study, we evaluated the performance of automated inoculating system, Previ Isola for various routine clinical samples including blood. Methods Blood culture, body fluid, and urine samples were collected. All samples were inoculated on both sheep blood agar plate (BAP) and MacConkey agar plate (MCK) using Previ Isola and manual method. We compared two methods in aspect of quality and quantity of cultures, and sample processing time. To ensure objective colony counting, an enumeration reading reference was made through a preliminary experiment. Results A total of 377 nonduplicate samples (102 blood culture, 203 urine, 72 body fluid) were collected and inoculated. The concordance rate of quality was 100%, 97.0%, and 98.6% in blood, urine, and other body fluids, respectively. In quantitative aspect, it was 98.0%, 97.0%, and 95.8%, respectively. The Previ Isola took a little longer to inoculate the specimen than manual method, but the hands‐on time decreased dramatically. The shortened hands‐on time using Previ Isola was about 6?minutes per 10 samples. Conclusion We demonstrated that the Previ Isola showed high concordance with the manual method in the inoculation of various body fluids, especially in blood culture sample. The use of Previ Isola in clinical microbiology laboratories is expected to save considerable time and human resources.
机译:背景技术平板划线的过程已实现自动化,以改善临床微生物实验室的常规工作流程。尽管有许多关于接种各种体液样品的评估报告,但鲜有关于血液的评估报告。在这项研究中,我们评估了自动接种系统Previ Isola在包括血液在内的各种常规临床样品中的性能。方法收集血培养,体液和尿液样本。使用Previ Isola和手动方法将所有样品接种在绵羊血琼脂平板(BAP)和MacConkey琼脂平板(MCK)上。我们在培养的质量和数量以及样品处理时间方面比较了两种方法。为了确保客观的菌落计数,通过初步实验做了一个列举阅读参考。结果收集并接种了377份重复样本(102份血液培养物,203份尿液,72份体液)。在血液,尿液和其他体液中,质量的合格率分别为100%,97.0%和98.6%。在数量方面,分别为98.0%,97.0%和95.8%。 Previ Isola接种标本所花的时间比手动方法要长一些,但是动手时间大大减少了。每10个样品,使用Previ Isola缩短的动手时间约为6分钟。结论我们证明了Previ Isola在接种各种体液(尤其是血液培养样品)中与手动方法显示出高度一致性。在临床微生物学实验室中使用Previ Isola有望节省大量时间和人力资源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号