...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Drug Assessment >Phase 2, randomized, open-label study on catheter-directed thrombolysis with plasmin versus rtPA and placebo in acute peripheral arterial occlusion
【24h】

Phase 2, randomized, open-label study on catheter-directed thrombolysis with plasmin versus rtPA and placebo in acute peripheral arterial occlusion

机译:纤溶酶与rtPA和安慰剂治疗急性外周动脉阻塞的导管定向溶栓治疗的2期随机开放标签研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Patients with acute peripheral arterial occlusion (aPAO) are candidates for operative thrombectomy, bypass, or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using a plasminogen activator. Human plasma-derived plasmin may offer another CDT option. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two intrathrombus delivery methods and two doses of plasmin compared with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and placebo in patients with aPAO. Patients/methods: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label study of intra-arterial CDT of plasmin in patients with aPAO. The study used infusion catheters with or without balloon occlusion (BOC) to evaluate 150?mg plasmin (2 and 5?h post-infusion) and 250?mg plasmin (5?h post-infusion). The efficacy of plasmin, rtPA and placebo was assessed. Results: One hundred and seventy-four subjects were enrolled. Overall, the thrombolytic efficacy (&50% thrombolysis) was 59% (58/99) for 150?mg plasmin without BOC, which is comparable to 89% (8/9) for rtPA without BOC ( p ?=?0.149) and 40% (2/5) for placebo control ( p?= ?0.648). The thrombolytic efficacy was 33% of the 250?mg plasmin group. There was no difference ( p ?&?0.999) in thrombolytic efficacy with BOC (59%, 58/99) or without BOC (59%, 17/29). Plasmin-treated groups experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at 71% (76/107) without BOC and 63% (24/38) with BOC; 78% (7/9) of the rtPA-treated group and 89% (8/9) of the placebo group had TEAEs. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 29% (31/107) of the 150?mg plasmin group without BOC and 24% (9/38) with BOC. No SAEs occurred in the 250?mg plasmin group. Conclusions: Plasmin demonstrated less bleeding during catheter-directed administration at 150?mg and 250?mg doses compared to rtPA. BOC utilization did not improve efficacy. CDT with plasmin has a potential thrombolytic benefit in patients presenting with aPAO. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01222117
机译:背景:患有急性外周动脉阻塞(aPAO)的患者适合使用纤溶酶原激活剂进行手术血栓切除,旁路或导管定向溶栓(CDT)。人血浆来源的纤溶酶可能提供另一种CDT选择。目的:评价两种血栓内递送方法和两种剂量的纤溶酶与重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)和安慰剂相比在aPAO患者中的疗效,安全性和耐受性。患者/方法:这是aPAO患者的纤溶酶的动脉内CDT的2期随机,开放标签研究。该研究使用有或无球囊闭塞(BOC)的输液导管评估150?mg纤溶酶(输注后2和5?h)和250?mg纤溶酶(输注后5?h)。评估了纤溶酶,rtPA和安慰剂的疗效。结果:入选了174名受试者。总体而言,对于不带BOC的150?mg纤溶酶,溶栓效率(大于50%溶栓)为59%(58/99),与不带BOC的rtPA的溶栓效率相当(89%(8/9))(p = 0.149)。安慰剂对照为40%(2/5)(p?=?0.648)。 250毫克纤溶酶组的溶栓效率为33%。使用BOC(59%,58/99)或不使用BOC(59%,17/29)时的溶栓效果没有差异(p≥0.999)。血浆纤溶酶治疗组在没有BOC的情况下出现治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)的比例为71%(76/107),在BOC的情况下为63%(24/38)。 rtPA治疗组的78%(7/9)和安慰剂组的89%(8/9)患有TEAE。 150 mg纤溶酶组未发生BOC时发生严重AE(SAE)的比例为29%(31/107),发生BOC时发生了24%(9/38)。 250 mg纤溶酶组未发生SAE。结论:与rtPA相比,在150?mg和250?mg剂量的导管指导给药期间,血浆纤溶蛋白的出血更少。使用BOC并未提高疗效。 CDT和纤溶酶对患有aPAO的患者具有潜在的溶栓作用。 ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01222117

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号