首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Drug Assessment >Phase 2 randomized open-label study on catheter-directed thrombolysis with plasmin versus rtPA and placebo in acute peripheral arterial occlusion
【2h】

Phase 2 randomized open-label study on catheter-directed thrombolysis with plasmin versus rtPA and placebo in acute peripheral arterial occlusion

机译:纤溶酶与rtPA和安慰剂治疗急性外周动脉闭塞的导管定向溶栓治疗的2期随机开放标签研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Patients with acute peripheral arterial occlusion (aPAO) are candidates for operative thrombectomy, bypass, or catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) using a plasminogen activator. Human plasma-derived plasmin may offer another CDT option.>Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of two intrathrombus delivery methods and two doses of plasmin compared with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) and placebo in patients with aPAO.>Patients/methods: This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label study of intra-arterial CDT of plasmin in patients with aPAO. The study used infusion catheters with or without balloon occlusion (BOC) to evaluate 150 mg plasmin (2 and 5 h post-infusion) and 250 mg plasmin (5 h post-infusion). The efficacy of plasmin, rtPA and placebo was assessed.>Results: One hundred and seventy-four subjects were enrolled. Overall, the thrombolytic efficacy (>50% thrombolysis) was 59% (58/99) for 150 mg plasmin without BOC, which is comparable to 89% (8/9) for rtPA without BOC (p = 0.149) and 40% (2/5) for placebo control (p = 0.648). The thrombolytic efficacy was 33% of the 250 mg plasmin group. There was no difference (p > 0.999) in thrombolytic efficacy with BOC (59%, 58/99) or without BOC (59%, 17/29). Plasmin-treated groups experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) at 71% (76/107) without BOC and 63% (24/38) with BOC; 78% (7/9) of the rtPA-treated group and 89% (8/9) of the placebo group had TEAEs. Serious AEs (SAEs) occurred in 29% (31/107) of the 150 mg plasmin group without BOC and 24% (9/38) with BOC. No SAEs occurred in the 250 mg plasmin group.>Conclusions: Plasmin demonstrated less bleeding during catheter-directed administration at 150 mg and 250 mg doses compared to rtPA. BOC utilization did not improve efficacy. CDT with plasmin has a potential thrombolytic benefit in patients presenting with aPAO.>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
机译:>背景:患有急性外周动脉闭塞(aPAO)的患者可以使用纤溶酶原激活剂进行手术血栓切除,旁路或导管定向溶栓(CDT)。人血浆来源的纤溶酶可能提供另一种CDT选择。>目的:与重组组织纤溶酶原激活剂(rtPA)和安慰剂相比,评估两种血栓内递送方法和两种剂量的纤溶酶的疗效,安全性和耐受性>患者/方法:这是aPAO患者的纤溶酶的动脉内CDT的2期随机,开放标签研究。该研究使用具有或不具有球囊闭塞(BOC)的输液导管评估150μmg纤溶酶(输注后2和5 h)和250μmg纤溶酶(输注后5 h)。评估了纤溶酶,rtPA和安慰剂的疗效。>结果:招募了174名受试者。总体而言,对于不含BOC的150μmg纤溶酶,其溶栓效率(> 50%溶栓)为59%(58/99),与不含BOC的rtPA的溶栓效率(p = 0.149)和89%(8/9)相当(40%( 2/5)用于安慰剂对照(p = 0.648)。 250 µmg纤溶酶组的溶栓效率为33%。 BOC(59%,58/99)或不使用BOC(59%,17/29)时的溶栓疗效无差异(p> 0.999)。血浆纤溶酶治疗组在没有BOC的情况下出现治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)的比例为71%(76/107),在BOC的情况下为63%(24/38)。 rtPA治疗组的78%(7/9)和安慰剂组的89%(8/9)患有TEAE。 150 mg纤溶酶组中无BOC发生严重AE(SAE)的比例为29%(31/107),有BOC的发生率为24%(9/38)。在250μmg纤溶酶组中未发生SAE。>结论:与rtPA相比,在150μmg和250μmg剂量的导管定向给药期间,血浆纤溶酶的出血较少。使用BOC并未提高疗效。 CDT和纤溶酶对患有aPAO的患者具有潜在的溶栓作用。> ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号