...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. >Diagnostic Performance of an Anti‐Actin Autoantibody Binding Enzyme Immunodot Blot in Autoimmune Hepatitis Type 1
【24h】

Diagnostic Performance of an Anti‐Actin Autoantibody Binding Enzyme Immunodot Blot in Autoimmune Hepatitis Type 1

机译:抗肌动蛋白自身抗体结合酶免疫斑点对1型自身免疫性肝炎的诊断性能

获取原文

摘要

Background A serologic hallmark of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) type 1 are anti-smooth muscle autoantibodies (ASMA) with specificity for filamentous actin (F-actin; AAA (anti-actin antibodies)), traditionally detected by indirect immunofluorescence (IFT) using rat liver, kidney, and stomach tissue sections as substrates. However, IFT is a subjective method requiring an experienced investigator. Therefore, a more objective technique for the detection of AAA may be a helpful diagnostic tool. Methods In a retrospective study with cross-sectional design, we evaluated AAA detected by an enzyme immunodot blot (IDB; Liver5 IgG BlueDot, D-tek, Mons, Belgium). Serum samples of patients with AIH type 1 ( n = 47) and specified controls ( n = 142) were included. For comparison, standard IFT was applied to rat LKS (liver, kidney, stomach) triple tissue sections. Results IDB readings were done by two independent investigators (92% concordance). The diagnostic sensitivity of the AAA-IDB was 70%, compared to 51% of AAA-IFT (n.s.). The diagnostic specificity of AAA-IDB was significantly lower compared to AAA-IFT (76% vs. 94%; P Conclusion Compared to standard IFT, testing for AAA via IDB did not result in a significantly better diagnostic performance for AIH type 1. A blot with higher antigen binding specificity may be more functional.
机译:背景1型自身免疫性肝炎(AIH)的血清学标志是对平滑肌肌自身抗体(ASMA)具有特异性的丝状肌动蛋白(F-肌动蛋白; AAA(抗肌动蛋白抗体)),传统上通过大鼠间接免疫荧光(IFT)检测肝,肾和胃组织切片作为基质。但是,IFT是一种需要经验丰富的调查员的主观方法。因此,更客观的AAA检测技术可能是有用的诊断工具。方法在横断面设计的回顾性研究中,我们评估了通过酶免疫斑点印迹(IDB; Liver5 IgG BlueDot,D-tek,比利时蒙斯)检测到的AAA。包括1型AIH患者(n = 47)和特定对照(n = 142)的血清样本。为了进行比较,将标准IFT应用于大鼠LKS(肝,肾,胃)三重组织切片。结果美洲开发银行的读数是由两名独立调查员完成的(一致性为92%)。 AAA-IDB的诊断灵敏度为70%,而AAA-IFT的诊断灵敏度为51%。与AAA-IFT相比,AAA-IDB的诊断特异性显着较低(76%对94%; P结论与标准IFT相比,通过IDB对AAA进行测试并没有显着改善AIH 1型的诊断性能。具有更高抗原结合特异性的印迹可能更具功能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号