首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives >The effect of demographic characteristics, Country of birth and country of medical training on the peer evaluations of internal medicine resident physicians
【24h】

The effect of demographic characteristics, Country of birth and country of medical training on the peer evaluations of internal medicine resident physicians

机译:人口统计学特征,出生国家和医疗培训国家对内科住院医师同行评价的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

ABSTRACT Background : Peer review by resident physicians, a standard evaluation technique, has rarely been studied for potential biases related to demographic and cultural characteristics of trainees. Objective : The study sought to determine whether peer evaluations were favorably biased toward trainees of similar background. Methods : This observational study was conducted in the Internal Medicine residency of a large, metropolitan, community hospital, and included all 91 Internal Medicine residents who had entered the program from 1 July 2009 thru 30 June 2017. Of 3,445 Peer Evaluation Forms (PEF)s offered, 2,922 (84%) were completed and studied. Multivariate statistical analysis was completed. The primary dependent variable was the Peer Evaluation Score (PES). Independent variables included age, gender, race, birth country and country of medical school training. Confounding variables included United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) and In-Training Examination (ITE) scores, and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) yearly assessment. Results : Confounding factors accounted for most of the variation. Among the independent variables, only age difference and medical school country were statistically associated with PES. Race and Gender were not significant. Conclusions : Peer evaluations were not significantly biased by race or gender similarities and only minimally biased by age and medical school country similarities.
机译:摘要背景:常驻医师的同行评审是一种标准的评估技术,很少研究与受训者的人口统计学和文化特征有关的潜在偏见。目的:该研究试图确定同伴评估是否偏向于具有相似背景的受训者。方法:这项观察性研究是在一家大型城市社区医院的内科住院医师中进行的,纳入了从2009年7月1日至2017年6月30日进入该计划的所有91名内科住院医师。在3,445个对等评估表(PEF)中提供了2,922(84%)个完成并进行了研究。多元统计分析已完成。主要因变量是对等评估分数(PES)。自变量包括年龄,性别,种族,出生国家和医学院校培训国家。令人困惑的变量包括美国医学许可考试(USMLE)和培训中考试(ITE)分数,以及美国内科医学委员会(ABIM)的年度评估。结果:混杂因素占大多数差异。在独立变量中,只有年龄差异和医学院国家与PES有统计学意义。种族和性别并不重要。结论:同龄人的评估并没有因种族或性别相似性而有明显的偏倚,而仅受年龄和医学院校国家相似性的影响很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号