首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy >Universities Must Continue to Bargain
【24h】

Universities Must Continue to Bargain

机译:大学必须继续讨价还价

获取原文
       

摘要

Faculty with collective bargaining rights across the nation will—and should—agree with Daniel Julius’s conclusion that “College and university leaders should continue to honor collectively negotiated agreements maintaining relationships with faculty unions.” When implemented correctly, these agreements, as Julius points out, serve the interests of both faculty and administrators. Such agreements codify and protect due process rights for both sides. They also provide both faculty and administrators with a level of predictability and stability in labor relations that are necessary on today’s complex and hectic campuses. While I agree with almost everything Julius has written here, there are a number of additional reasons, which Julius doesn’t consider, for universities to continue to bargain. These reasons, which I explain below, are rooted in the larger forces shaping higher education.
机译:在全国范围内拥有集体谈判权的教师将并且应该同意丹尼尔·朱利叶斯(Daniel Julius)的结论,即“大学和大学的领导者应继续遵守通过集体谈判达成的协议,以维护与教职工工会的关系。”如Julius所指出,如果正确实施这些协议,则可以为教职员工和管理人员谋福利。这样的协议将双方的法律编纂和保护起来。他们还为教职员工和管理人员提供了一定程度的可预测性和稳定的劳资关系,这在当今复杂而繁忙的校园中是必需的。尽管我同意Julius在这里写的几乎所有内容,但还有很多其他原因(大学认为Julius不会考虑)可以继续讨价还价。我在下面解释的这些原因都源于塑造高等教育的更大力量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号