...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : >Cardiac and hepatic iron and ejection fraction in thalassemia major: Multicentre prospective comparison of combined Deferiprone and Deferoxamine therapy against Deferiprone or Deferoxamine Monotherapy
【24h】

Cardiac and hepatic iron and ejection fraction in thalassemia major: Multicentre prospective comparison of combined Deferiprone and Deferoxamine therapy against Deferiprone or Deferoxamine Monotherapy

机译:重度地中海贫血患者的心脏,肝铁和射血分数:联合使用Deferiprone和Deferoxamine疗法与Deferiprone或Deferoxamine Monotherapy的多中心前瞻性比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundDue to the limited data available in literature, the aim of this multi-centre study was to prospectively compare in thalassemia major (TM) patients the efficacy of combined deferiprone (DFP) and deferoxamine (DFO) regimen versus either DFP and DFO in monotherapy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) over a follow up of 18 months.MethodsAmong the first 1135 TM patients in the MIOT (Myocardial Iron Overload in Thalassemia) network, we evaluated those who had received either combined regimen (DFO + DFP, N=51) or DFP (N=39) and DFO (N=74) monotherapies between the two CMR scans. Iron overload was measured by T2* multiecho technique. Biventricular function parameters were quantitatively evaluated by cine images.ResultsThe percentage of patients that maintained a normal global heart T2* value was comparable between DFP+DFO versus both monotherapy groups. Among the patients with myocardial iron overload at baseline, the changes in the global heart T2* and in biventricular function were not significantly different in DFP+DFO compared with the DFP group. The improvement in the global heart T2* was significantly higher in the DFP+DFO than the DFO group, without a difference in biventricular function. Among the patients with hepatic iron at baseline, the decrease in liver iron concentration values was significantly higher with combination therapy than with either monotherapy group.ConclusionsIn TM patients at the dosages used in the real world, the combined DFP+DFO regimen was more effective in removing cardiac iron than DFO, and was superior in clearing hepatic iron than either DFO or DFP monotherapy. Combined therapy did not show an additional effect on heart function over DFP.
机译:背景由于文献资料有限,这项多中心研究的目的是前瞻性比较地中海贫血重症(TM)患者通过单药联合使用去铁酮(DFP)和去铁胺(DFO)方案相对于DFP和DFO的疗效方法在MIOT(地中海贫血症中的心肌铁超负荷)网络中的首批1135 TM患者中,我们评估了接受这两种联合方案的患者(DFO + DFP,N = 51)或两次CMR扫描之间的DFP(N = 39)和DFO(N = 74)单一疗法。铁过载通过T2 *多回波技术测量。通过电影图像对双心室功能参数进行定量评估。结果DFP + DFO组与两个单药治疗组相比,维持总体心脏T2 *值正常的患者百分比相当。在基线时有心肌铁超负荷的患者中,与DFP组相比,DFP + DFO的总体心脏T2 *和双心室功能的变化无显着差异。在DFP + DFO中,总体心脏T2 *的改善显着高于DFO组,而双心室功能无差异。在基线时有肝铁的患者中,联合治疗的肝铁浓度降低明显高于任一单一治疗组。结论在现实世界中以TM剂量使用TM的患者中,DFP + DFO联合治疗更有效。与DFO相比,清除心脏铁的效果优于DFO或DFP单一疗法。与DFP相比,联合治疗并未对心脏功能产生额外影响。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号