...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy photon energy on quality of life after breast conservation therapy: Linear accelerator versus the cobalt machine
【24h】

Impact of adjuvant radiation therapy photon energy on quality of life after breast conservation therapy: Linear accelerator versus the cobalt machine

机译:辅助放射治疗光子能量对保乳治疗后生活质量的影响:直线加速器与钴机的比较

获取原文

摘要

Background: Breast conservative therapy (BCT) is a standard treatment option in early operable breast cancers (OBC) and a select group of large or locally advanced tumors. The present study deals with prospective evaluation of quality of life (QOL) score in consecutive patients treated with BCT employing adjuvant RT treated with either a cobalt machine or a linear accelerator (LA). Material and Methods: Patients of carcinoma breast who underwent BCT were taken into the study. Patients with larger breasts (inter-field separation 18-20 cm) were treated on LA and those with smaller breasts were treated on cobalt machine. All patients received a uniform RT dose (45-50 Gy/25#/5 weeks) to whole breast followed by tumor bed boost with suitable energy electrons. Prospective evaluation of QOL was done using EORTC QLQ C30 and breast cancer-specific EORTC QLQ BR23. QOL evaluation was done at pre-RT, at half completion of RT treatment (at 20-23 fractions) and at completion of RT. Results: Pre-RT evaluation GQOL scores in patients treated with cobalt and LA were 71.6 and 71.7, respectively (P = 0.8). QLQ C30 functional and symptom domain scores were also similar in the groups. At RT completion, Global quality of life (GQOL) scores were 67.7 in patients treated with cobalt as compared to 77.7 in patients treated with LA (P = 0.75). Physical function domain scores in cobalt and LA patients were 70.8 and 80.3, respectively (P = 0.26). Fatigue score was higher in patients treated with cobalt (39.1 versus 29.7; P = 0.9). However, there was no difference in other functional and symptom domains. There was no significant change in any of the EORTC QLQ C30 domains at RT completion as compared to the pre-RT scores. Conclusion: There is no significant difference in QOL domains between appropriately selected patients treated with cobalt and LA. There are no significant changes in QOL domain scores at RT conclusion as compared to pre-RT baseline in patients treated with cobalt or LA source. A cobalt machine may be effectively used to deliver adjuvant RT in appropriately selected BCT patients especially in developing countries with limited resources.
机译:背景:乳腺癌保守治疗(BCT)是早期可手术乳腺癌(OBC)和部分大型或局部晚期肿瘤的标准治疗选择。本研究涉及对连续BCT治疗的患者进行生活质量(QOL)评分的前瞻性评估,这些患者接受了用钴机或线性加速器(LA)治疗的辅助性RT治疗。材料与方法:将接受BCT的癌性乳腺癌患者纳入研究。乳房较大的患者(场间距> 18-20 cm)在LA上治疗,乳房较小的患者在钴机上治疗。所有患者均对整个乳房接受统一的RT剂量(45-50 Gy / 25#/ 5周),然后通过适当的能量电子增强肿瘤床位。使用EORTC QLQ C30和乳腺癌特异性EORTC QLQ BR23对QOL进行前瞻性评估。 QOL评估是在RT前,RT治疗的一半完成(20-23分数)和RT完成时进行的。结果:RT评估钴和LA治疗的患者的GQOL评分分别为71.6和71.7(P = 0.8)。在各组中,QLQ C30功能和症状域评分也相似。在RT完成时,接受钴治疗的患者的全球生活质量(GQOL)得分为67.7,而接受LA治疗的患者为77.7(P = 0.75)。钴和洛杉矶患者的身体机能范围得分分别为70.8和80.3(P = 0.26)。接受钴治疗的患者的疲劳评分更高(39.1比29.7; P = 0.9)。但是,其他功能和症状域没有差异。与RT之前的分数相比,RT完成时任何EORTC QLQ C30域都没有显着变化。结论:在生活质量领域与钴和LA治疗适当选择病人之间没有显著差异。与钴或洛杉矶来源治疗的患者相比,RT结束时的QOL域评分与RT之前的基线相比没有显着变化。甲钴机可有效地用于输送辅助RT中适当选择BCT患者尤其是在资源有限的发展中国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号