...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer >Efficacy of the Additional Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Efficacy of the Additional Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: a Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:局部区域晚期鼻咽癌患者额外新辅助化疗对同期放化疗的疗效:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Due to the lack of studies, it remains unclear whether the additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to CCRT alone for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The main objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of NACT+CCRT as compared with CCRT alone. Methods: We comprehensively searched databases and extracted data from randomized controlled trials involving NPC patients who received NACT+CCRT, CCRT, NACT+radiotherapy (RT), or RT. Overall survival (OS) with hazard ratio (HR), and locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and distant metastasis rate (DMR) with relative risks (RRs), were concerned. Results: Nine trials involving 1988 patients were analyzed. In the network meta-analysis, there was significant benefit of NACT+CCRT over CCRT for DMR (RR=0.54, 95% credible interval [CrI]=0.27-0.94). However, NACT+CCRT had a tendency to worsen locoregional control significantly as compared with CCRT (RR =1.71, 95%CrI =0.94-2.84), and no significant improvement in OS was found (HR =0.73, 95%CrI=0.40-1.23). Conclusions: NACT+CCRT is associated with reduced distant failure as compared with CCRT alone, and whether the additional NACT can improve survival for locoregionally advanced NPC should be further explored. Optimizing regimens and identifying patients at high risk of metastasis may enhance the efficacy of NACT+CCRT.
机译:背景:由于缺乏研究,对于局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC),新的辅助化疗(NACT)替代同期放化疗(CCRT)是否优于单独的CCRT尚不清楚。该贝叶斯网络荟萃分析的主要目的是确定NACT + CCRT与单独CCRT相比的疗效。方法:我们全面搜索数据库并从涉及NACT + CCRT,CCRT,NACT +放射疗法(RT)或RT的NPC患者的随机对照试验中提取数据。关注总生存率(OS)与危险比(HR),局部复发率(LRR)和远处转移率(DMR)及相对风险(RRs)。结果:分析了涉及1988例患者的9项试验。在网络荟萃分析中,对于DMR,NACT + CCRT优于CCRT(RR = 0.54,95%可信区间[CrI] = 0.27-0.94)。但是,与CCRT相比,NACT + CCRT有显着恶化局部区域控制的趋势(RR = 1.71,95%CrI = 0.94-2.84),并且未发现OS的显着改善(HR = 0.73,95%CrI = 0.40- 1.23)。结论:与单独使用CCRT相比,NACT + CCRT与减少远距离衰竭有关,还应进一步探讨是否另外使用NACT可以改善局部晚期NPC的生存率。优化方案并确定转移风险高的患者可以增强NACT + CCRT的疗效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号