...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer >Current Practice Patterns Regarding the Conduct of Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy amongst Surgeons - A Survey Study
【24h】

Current Practice Patterns Regarding the Conduct of Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy amongst Surgeons - A Survey Study

机译:外科医生进行甲状腺切除术和甲状旁腺切除术的现行实践模式-调查研究

获取原文

摘要

Background: Heterogeneity of surgical care exists among surgeons regarding the conduct of thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. Aim: To identify the current patterns of technical conduct of operation amongst surgeons performing thyroidectomy or parathyroidectomy. Methods: A survey was designed and beta-tested on five surgical oncologists for face validity and usability. The final version of this survey was constructed and disseminated using the professional version of the internet-based survey mechanism Survey Monkey and consisted of two eligibility questions and 22 questions regarding thyroidectomy/parathyroidectomy treatment patterns. The survey was disseminated electronically to American Association of Endocrine Surgeons (AAES) and American College of Surgeons (ACS) members. Survey results were collected, tabulated and analyzed. Responses among groups were compared using two sample T- tests. Significant responses were subsequently analyzed in generalized linear models to ascertain if significance remained with control of covariates. Results: Of 420 initial web survey visits, 236 (56.2%) surveys were completed. The majority of respondents reported being 'fellowship trained', experienced and 'high-volume' surgeons. The most common fellowship trainings were endocrine (46%), oncology (22%), head & neck (13%), or combinations of the three fellowships (14%). Most surgeons reported that they dissect the course of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) without using neuromonitoring. Nearly a third of respondents reported routinely using the Harmonic scalpel during the conduct of the operations. Significant differences emerged regarding operative technique according to residency training type, fellowship training, surgeon volume, and practice setting, but only those associated with residency training type and annual surgeon surgical volume remained significant within generalized linear models. Conclusion: Most surgeons who responded to this survey do not routinely use RLN neuromonitoring and most dissect the RLN during thyroidectomy. There are multiple variations in technique according to surgical training, surgeon volume, experience, and practice setting; however, only differences by residency training type and surgeon volume remained correlated significantly to surgeons' approaches to thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy in multivariate analysis. These data may be useful for surgeons reflecting upon their individual practice, as well as for further defining current standards of practice from a medico legal perspective.
机译:背景:外科医生在甲状腺切除术和甲状旁腺切除术的手术中存在异质性。目的:确定进行甲状腺切除术或甲状旁腺切除术的外科医生当前的手术技术行为模式。方法:针对五位外科肿瘤学家设计了一项调查表,并对其进行了Beta测试,以评估其面部有效性和可用性。该调查的最终版本是使用基于互联网的调查机制Survey Monkey的专业版本构建和分发的,由两个资格问题和22个有关甲状腺切除术/甲状旁腺切除术治疗模式的问题组成。该调查以电子方式分发给了美国内分泌外科医师协会(AAES)和美国外科医师学会(ACS)成员。收集调查结果,制成表格并进行分析。使用两个样本T检验比较各组之间的反应。随后在广义线性模型中分析了显着的响应,以确定在协变量控制下是否仍然存在显着性。结果:在420次初始网络调查访问中,完成了236次(56.2%)调查。大多数受访者称他们是“进修培训”,经验丰富且“大批量”的外科医生。最常见的研究金培训是内分泌(46%),肿瘤学(22%),头部和颈部(13%)或三种研究金的组合(14%)。大多数外科医生报告说,他们不使用神经监测就解剖了喉返神经的过程。近三分之一的受访者表示在手术过程中经常使用谐波手术刀。根据住院医师培训类型,研究金培训,外科医生人数和实践环境,在手术技术上出现了显着差异,但在广义线性模型中,只有与住院医师培训类型和年度外科医生手术量相关的那些技术才有意义。结论:对本次调查有反应的大多数外科医生不常规使用RLN神经监测,并且在甲状腺切除术中大部分解剖RLN。根据外科手术训练,外科医生的体型,经验和实践环境,技术上会有多种变化。然而,在多变量分析中,只有住院医师培训类型和外科医生人数的差异仍与外科医生的甲状腺切除术和甲状旁腺切除术的方法显着相关。这些数据对于外科医生反映他们的个人实践以及从医学法律角度进一步定义当前的实践标准可能很有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号