首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Breast Cancer >Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients with Previous Excisional Biopsy
【24h】

Value of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients with Previous Excisional Biopsy

机译:前哨淋巴结活检的乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检的价值

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla will ensure axillary dissection only for cases with lymph node metastasis and provide information about pathologic staging as accurate as the axillary dissection. It was shown that SLNB could be successfully performed regardless of the type of biopsy. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of SLNB after excisional biopsy. Methods One hundred patients diagnosed with excisional biopsy or guide wire-localization and operated on with SLNB between February 2007 and March 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. SLNB was performed with 10 cc of 1% methylene blue alone or both methylene blue and 1 mCi of Tc-99m nanocolloid combination. Age, tumor localization and size, length of the biopsy incision, size of the biopsy specimen, multifocality, lymphovascular invasion, tumor grade, staining with methylene blue, localization, number and metastatic status of the lymph nodes stained, and success rate with a gamma probe were evaluated. Results Sentinel lymph node (SLN) could not be identified in 9 (16.9%) of patients in the methylene blue group (n=53). In the combination group (n=47), SLN could not be identified in one patient. Of 32 patients with negative SLNB, metastatic involvement was found to be present in 5 patients after axillary lymph node dissection (false negatives). The average numbers of SLNs found in the methylene blue group and combination group were 1.4 and 1.6, respectively. SLN detection and false negative rates in the methylene blue group were 83% and 15.7%, respectively. The rates for the combination group were 98% and 6.4%, respectively. None of the parameters related to patient, tumor or process were found to affect detection rates of SLN. Conclusion Only SLNB using a combination method is a safe and reliable technique for breast cancer patients diagnosed with excisional biopsy.
机译:目的对于腋窝临床阴性的乳腺癌患者,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)仅在有淋巴结转移的病例中确保腋窝淋巴结清扫,并提供与腋窝淋巴结清扫一样准确的病理分期信息。结果表明,不管活检的类型如何,SLNB都可以成功进行。这项研究的目的是调查切除活检后SLNB的可行性。方法回顾性分析2007年2月至2009年3月间经SLNB行手术切除的100例行活检或导线定位术的患者。 SLNB用10 cc的1%亚甲基蓝单独或亚甲基蓝和1 mCi的Tc-99m纳米胶体组合进行。年龄,肿瘤定位和大小,活检切口的长度,活检样本的大小,多灶性,淋巴管浸润,肿瘤等级,亚甲蓝染色,淋巴结的定位,数目和转移状态以及成功率对探针进行了评估。结果亚甲蓝组(n = 53)中有9例(16.9%)患者未发现前哨淋巴结(SLN)。在组合组(n = 47)中,一位患者无法识别出SLN。在32名SLNB阴性的患者中,发现5名腋窝淋巴结清扫术后有转移受累(假阴性)。在亚甲基蓝组和组合组中发现的SLN的平均数分别为1.4和1.6。亚甲蓝组的SLN检测率和假阴性率分别为83%和15.7%。组合组的比率分别为98%和6.4%。没有发现与患者,肿瘤或过程相关的参数影响SLN的检出率。结论只有SLNB联合使用方法对被诊断为切除活检的乳腺癌患者是一种安全可靠的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号