首页> 外文期刊>Journal of biomolecular techniques :JBT. >Incorporating In-Source Fragments Improves Metabolite Identification Accuracy in Untargeted LCMS and LCMS/MS Datasets
【24h】

Incorporating In-Source Fragments Improves Metabolite Identification Accuracy in Untargeted LCMS and LCMS/MS Datasets

机译:整合源内片段可提高非目标LCMS和LCMS / MS数据集中代谢物的鉴定准确性

获取原文
       

摘要

In untargeted metabolomics experiments library search engines detect metabolites using several features, including precursor mass, isotopic distribution, retention time, and MS2 fragmentation. Matching acquired MS2 to library spectra is vital as numerous compounds share molecular formulas, resulting in identical precursor measurements and similar retention times. However, many metabolomics experiments are still collected using LC-MS only, and even in LC-MS/MS experiments many precursors lack MS2 spectra due to the stochastic nature of data dependent acquisition. We observe that when metabolites ionize they can produce unanticipated MS1 features resulting from neutral losses, in-source fragmentation, multimerization, and adducts. Here we present a new approach to leverage these measurements to identify metabolites when MS2 spectra are of low quality or not available. We processing datasets of 75 known standards mixed with whole yeast lysates to strip them of their MS2 scans to produce a gold-standard MS1-only data set of a complex metabolome with known targets. For each dataset we determined the proportion unambiguous annotations (where the correct annotation had a higher score than other potential annotations) and unmistakable annotations (where the correct annotation was the only valid annotation detected). We found that incorporating in-source fragments improved these metrics for both MS1-only (increasing from 60% to 73% unambiguous and 40% to 65% unmistakable matches) and MS2 datasets (from 79% to 84% unambiguous and 41% to 60% unmistakable). Unexpectedly, in these data we observed that the MS2 spectra were less useful than in-source fragment data for improving identification accuracy. We believe this is largely because the low-resolution iontrap MS2 spectra collected in this experiment show significant noise, which diminishes spectral match scores and allows other candidates to outscore the correct identifications. We suspect that noise is less likely to affect MS1 peak groups because they are generated from data aggregated across multiple high-resolution MS1 scans. Articles from Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT are provided here courtesy of The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities.
机译:在非目标代谢组学实验中,图书馆搜索引擎使用多种功能检测代谢物,包括前体质量,同位素分布,保留时间和MS2碎片化。将获得的MS2与谱库光谱相匹配至关重要,因为许多化合物共享分子式,从而获得相同的前体测量值和相似的保留时间。但是,仍然仅使用LC-MS收集许多代谢组学实验,并且即使在LC-MS / MS实验中,由于数据依赖采集的随机性,许多前体也缺少MS2光谱。我们观察到,当代谢物离子化时,由于中性损失,源内裂解,多聚和加合物,它们可能会产生无法预料的MS1特征。在这里,我们提出了一种新的方法,当MS2质谱图质量低下或无法获得时,利用这些测量结果来鉴定代谢物。我们处理的75种已知标准品的数据集与全酵母裂解物混合在一起,以剥离它们的MS2扫描图,以产生具有已知靶标的复杂代谢组的纯金标准MS1数据集。对于每个数据集,我们确定了明确注解(正确注解的得分高于其他潜在注解)和明确注解(正确注解是唯一检测到的有效注解)的比例。我们发现,合并源内片段可以改善仅MS1的数据(从60%到73%的无歧义和40%到65%的无误匹配)和MS2数据集(从79%到84%的无歧义和41%到60的这些指标) %毫无疑问)。出乎意料的是,在这些数据中,我们观察到MS2谱比源内片段数据对提高识别准确性的用处不大。我们认为,这在很大程度上是因为在该实验中收集的低分辨率离子阱MS2光谱显示出明显的噪声,从而降低了光谱匹配分数,并使其他候选物的得分超过正确的鉴定结果。我们怀疑噪声不太可能影响MS1峰组,因为它们是由跨多个高分辨率MS1扫描汇总的数据生成的。这里由生物分子资源设施协会提供了《生物分子技术杂志》上的文章:JBT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号