首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Blindness Innovation and Research >Accuracy of Five Talking Pedometers under Controlled Conditions
【24h】

Accuracy of Five Talking Pedometers under Controlled Conditions

机译:受控条件下五种会说话的计步器的准确性

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: This study examined the reliability and accuracy of five talking pedometers: Brookstone Talking Pedometer, Voice Zone, Sportline 343, Accusplit Alliance AL390, and Oregon Scientific PE829. All pedometers announced cumulative step count when the talk button was pressed. Methods: Ten older adults (73 ± 5.5 years old), and 13 adults with visual impairments (42.4 ± 13.6 years old) wore the pedometers during a 50-step walk, ascending and descending stairs. Pedometer step counts were compared to hand-tally counts. Results: All pedometers underestimated actual steps with higher prevalence of under-counting when ascending stairs and descending stairs. Average absolute errors follow: Brookstone (13.0%±13.8), Accusplit (18.7%±21.7), Voice Zone (20.2%±18.1), Oregon Scientific (25.7%±24.3) and Sportline (33.7±25.5). Conclusions: The Brookstone and Accusplit pedometers were the most accurate models. None of the talking pedometers tested appeared appropriate for research (maximum of 5% error) or general use (maximum of 10% error).
机译:背景:本研究检查了五种说话计步器的可靠性和准确性:布鲁克斯通说话计步器,语音区,Sportline 343,Accusplit Alliance AL390和俄勒冈科学PE829。当按下通话按钮时,所有计步器都宣布累计步数。方法:10位老年人(73±5.5岁)和13位视力障碍(42.4±13.6岁)成年人在步数为50的步行,上,下楼梯过程中佩戴了计步器。将计步器的步数与手动计数进行比较。结果:所有计步器都低估了实际步数,在上下楼梯时低计数率更高。平均绝对误差如下:布鲁克斯通(13.0%±13.8),直觉(18.7%±21.7),语音区(20.2%±18.1),俄勒冈科学(25.7%±24.3)和Sportline(33.7±25.5)。结论:Brookstone和Accusplit计步器是最准确的模型。所测试的有声计步器均未出现适合研究(误差最大为5%)或一般用途(误差最大为10%)的情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号