首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare >Participatory Nature of Farmer Field School Extension Approach as Compared with other Approaches in Edo and Ondo States, Nigeria
【24h】

Participatory Nature of Farmer Field School Extension Approach as Compared with other Approaches in Edo and Ondo States, Nigeria

机译:与尼日利亚江户和翁多州的农民田间学校扩展方法的参与性质相比,其他方法

获取原文
           

摘要

The study compares FFS extension approach with other major participatory approaches practiced in Edo and Ondo States, Nigeria. By means of a well structured and validated questionnaire, data were collected from 145 FFS farmers who had also been exposed to other participatory approaches. Data collected were analysed using various statistical tools like means, standard deviation and analysis of variance. The result shows that respondents perceived FFS as a better extension approach than any other extension approach. Respondents rated FFS higher than other approaches as they strongly agreed with all the statements that FFS has all the features of participatory extension (X = 4.51 to X = 4.95). On the other hand, Farming System Research was perceived by the respondents to slightly satisfy the features of participatory extension but FSR does not involve adult learning principles. Respondents did not perceive T & V and UAES to contain participatory extension approach as they disagreed with almost all the statements for the two extension approaches. The result of the analysis of variance indicates that there were significant differences among the four extension approaches (F = 3851 .513; P <0.05). A further analysis of the comparisons between the various extension approaches using Duncan Multiple Range Test shows that there was a significant difference between FFS and other extension approaches. It was concluded that FFS is more participatory and recommended among others that it be extended to all farmers.
机译:该研究将FFS扩展方法与在尼日利亚的江户和翁多州实践的其他主要参与性方法进行了比较。通过结构合理且经过验证的问卷调查,从145名FFS农民那里收集了数据,他们也接触了其他参与式方法。使用各种统计工具(例如均值,标准差和方差分析)分析收集的数据。结果表明,受访者认为FFS是比其他扩展方法更好的扩展方法。受访者对FFS的评价高于其他方法,因为他们完全同意FFS具有参与性扩展的所有特征的所有陈述(X = 4.51至X = 4.95)。另一方面,受访者认为“耕作制度研究”略微满足了参与性扩展的特征,但FSR不涉及成人学习原则。受访者不认为T&V和UAES包含参与式扩展方法,因为他们不同意两种扩展方法的几乎所有陈述。方差分析的结果表明,四种扩展方法之间存在显着差异(F = 3851 .513; P <0.05)。使用Duncan多范围测试对各种扩展方法之间的比较进行的进一步分析表明,FFS与其他扩展方法之间存在显着差异。结论是,农民田间学校更具有参与性,除其他外,建议将其扩展到所有农民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号